| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: page{at}u.washington.edu.
Introduction: Male hormonal contraceptive regimens function by suppressing gonadotropin secretion, resulting in a dramatic decrease in testicular androgen biosynthesis and spermatogenesis. Animal studies suggest that persistent intratesticular (iT-) androgen production has a stimulatory effect on spermatogenesis in the setting of gonadotropin suppression. Objectives: We hypothesized that men with incompletely suppressed spermatogenesis (>1 million sperm/ml) during male hormonal contraceptive treatment would have higher iT-androgen concentrations than men who achieved severe oligospermia (<=1 million sperm/ml). Methods: Twenty healthy men, ages 18-55 years enrolled in a 6-month male contraceptive study of transdermal testosterone (T) gel (100mg/day) + depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (300mg IM/12 wks) with or without the GnRH antagonist, acyline (300µg/kg SC/2 wks x 12 wks) were studied. During the 24th week of treatment, subjects underwent fine needle aspirations of the testes and iT-T and dihydrotestosterone (iT-DHT) were measured in testicular fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: All men dramatically suppressed spermatogenesis; 15/20 men were severely oligospermic and 5/20 suppressed to 1.5-3.2 million sperm/ml. In all subjects, mean iT-T and iT-DHT concentrations were 35±8 and 5.1±0.8 nmol/L. IT-androgen concentrations did not significantly differ in men who did and did not achieve severe oligospermia (p=0.41 for iT-T; p=0.18 for iT-DHT). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between iT-T or iT-DHT and sperm concentration after 24 weeks of treatment. Conclusions: In this study of prolonged gonadotropin suppression induced by male hormonal contraceptive treatment, differences in iT-androgens did not explain differences in spermatogenesis. Additional studies to identify factors involved in persistent spermatogenesis despite gonadotropin suppression are warranted.
Key words: Androgen
Contraception
Spermatogenesis
Testis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. T. Page, J. K. Amory, and W. J. Bremner Advances in Male Contraception Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Montgomery, E. A. Mostaghel, R. Vessella, D. L. Hess, T. F. Kalhorn, C. S. Higano, L. D. True, and P. S. Nelson Maintenance of Intratumoral Androgens in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Mechanism for Castration-Resistant Tumor Growth Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4447 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |