| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

From the * J. O. Almquist Research Center,
Department of Dairy and Animal Science, and
The Huck Institute of Life Sciences, The
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
| Correspondence to: Dr Gary J. Killian, J. O. Almquist Research Center, Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (e-mail: lwj{at}psu.edu). |
0) and low-fertility
sires (n = 8; PD < 0) and were also used as independent variables in
regression analysis. Proteins were identified by capillary liquid
chromatographynanoelectrospray ionizationtandem mass
spectrometry. An average of 118 spots was detected in 2-D maps of the CEF, but
we were unable to distinguish any protein that was expressed only in
high-fertility or in low-fertility bulls. However, the amount of
-L-fucosidase 2 and cathepsin D was 2.3- and 2.4-fold greater
(P < .05) in high-fertility than in low-fertility bulls,
respectively. Conversely, the intensities of 3 isoforms (2427 kd; pl
6.35.8) of prostaglandin D-synthase (PGDS) were from 3.2- to 2.2-fold
greater in low-fertility sires (P < .05). An empirical regression
model established that a significant proportion (R2 =
0.72; P < .0001) of the variation in fertility scores (PD values)
was explained by the intensities of cathepsin D and 1 isoform of PGDS (24 kd;
pl 6.3). Thus, multiple proteins present in the CEF are potential biomarkers
of fertility in high-use, mature Holstein bulls.
Key words:
-L-fucosidase, cathepsin D, epididymis, mass spectrometry, prostaglandin D-synthase, sperm
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Lippolis and T. A. Reinhardt CENTENNIAL PAPER: Proteomics in animal science J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2430 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lefievre, K. Bedu-Addo, S. J Conner, G. S M Machado-Oliveira, Y. Chen, J. C Kirkman-Brown, M. A Afnan, S. J Publicover, W C. L Ford, and C. L R Barratt Counting sperm does not add up any more: time for a new equation? Reproduction, April 1, 2007; 133(4): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |