This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 27/4/527    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zeng, W. Articles by Dobrinski, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zeng, W. Articles by Dobrinski, I.

Journal of Andrology, Vol. 27, No. 4, July/August 2006
Copyright © American Society of Andrology

The Length of the Spermatogenic Cycle Is Conserved in Porcine and Ovine Testis Xenografts

GLEIDE F. AVELAR

LUIZ R. FRANCA

From the ^* Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania; and the Laboratory of Cellular Biology, Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Correspondence to: Dr Ina Dobrinski, Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, 147 Myrin Building, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West St Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348 (e-mail: dobrinsk{at}vet.upenn.edu).

Xenografting of immature mammalian testis tissue into mice can accelerate sperm production. To determine whether this shortened time to sperm production is because of reduced length of the spermatogenic cycle, we applied bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation to analyze the spermatogenic cycle in porcine and ovine testis xenografts. Small testis fragments from newborn pigs and sheep were ectopically grafted into mice. Once complete spermatogenesis was present in grafted tissue, mice were injected with BrdU and grafts were recovered at different time points thereafter. In porcine grafts, the most advanced germ cells labeled 1 hour, 9 days, 12.3 days, and 18 days after BrdU injection were stage 1 preleptotene/leptotene primary spermatocytes, stage 1 pachytene primary spermatocytes, stage 5 newly-formed round spermatids, and late stage 2 elongating spermatids, respectively. In ovine grafts, the most advanced labeled germ cells at 1 hour, 11 days, and 22 days post-BrdU injection were stage 2 preleptotene/leptotene primary spermatocytes, late stage 1 pachytene primary spermatocytes, and stage 2 elongating spermatids, respectively. These results indicate that each spermatogenic cycle in porcine and ovine xenografts lasts approximately 9 and 11 days, respectively, which is similar to their durations in situ. Therefore, the length of the spermatogenic cycle is conserved in porcine and ovine testis xenografts. This is consistent with earlier reports showing that the cycle length is inherent to the germ cell genotype. The shortened time to sperm production in xenografts therefore appears attributable to accelerated maturation of the testicular somatic compartments. Our results suggest that testis xenografts provide a useful model to study the timing of testicular maturation and spermatogenesis in different mammalian species.

     Key words: Pig, sheep, graft, spermatogenesis, seminiferous epithelium cycle

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Arregui, R. Rathi, S. O Megee, A. Honaramooz, M. Gomendio, E. R S Roldan, and I. Dobrinski Xenografting of sheep testis tissue and isolated cells as a model for preservation of genetic material from endangered ungulates Reproduction, July 1, 2008; 136(1): 85 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Wyns, M. Curaba, B. Martinez-Madrid, A. Van Langendonckt, W. Francois-Xavier, and J. Donnez Spermatogonial survival after cryopreservation and short-term orthotopic immature human cryptorchid testicular tissue grafting to immunodeficient mice Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1603 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Parapanov, S. Nussle, and P. Vogel Cycle Length of Spermatogenesis in Shrews (Mammalia: Soricidae) with High and Low Metabolic Rates and Different Mating Systems Biol Reprod, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 833 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]