Journal of Andrology Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Andrology, Vol. 26, No. 4, July/August 2005
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.04172

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrios, B.
Right arrow Articles by Cebrián-Pérez, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrios, B.
Right arrow Articles by Cebrián-Pérez, J. A.

Immunocytochemical Localization and Biochemical Characterization of Two Seminal Plasma Proteins That Protect Ram Spermatozoa Against Cold Shock

BEATRIZ BARRIOS, MARTA FERNÁNDEZ-JUAN, TERESA MUIñO-BLANCO AND JOSÉ A. CEBRIÁN-PÉREZ

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Correspondence to: J. A. Cebrián Pérez, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Veterinaria, C/ Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain (e-mail: pcebrian{at}unizar.es).
Received for publication November 10, 2004; accepted for publication March 10, 2005.

   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have already shown that seminal plasma proteins in the ram can repair cold-shock sperm membrane damage and that the addition of seminal plasma proteins before cold-shock treatment prevents sperm membrane injury. In this study, we prove that 2 protein bands of approximately 14 (P14) and 20 (P20) kd isolated from seminal plasma are responsible for this protective effect. In vitro capacitation (CA) and acrosome reaction (AR) modified the content of both proteins on the sperm surface. P20 release began at the beginning of CA, and the induction of the AR accounted for an additional release of both proteins; not more than 35% of these proteins remained on acrosome-reacted sperm. Cytochemical analysis detected that there are several binding sites for P14 and P20 on the sperm surface and that membrane alterations induced by CA and the AR accounted for the loss and redistribution of both proteins to the equatorial and postequatorial regions. The P14-sequenced fragment showed a high homology with several seminal plasma proteins of different species and contained the FN 2 domain like bovine PDC-109. However, the sequence of the P20 fragment was not homologous with any reported protein. By immunochemical analysis, we obtained evidence that P14 is phosphorylated in serine and threonine residues and that P20 is a glycosylated protein. These results suggest that both proteins are involved in sperm CA and gamete interaction, first by stabilizing the sperm membrane and then by participating in CA in the female reproductive tract. The protective effect of P14 and P20 could be related to their decapacitating role.

     Key words: Immunocytochemistry, capacitation, acrosome reaction



Mammalian sperm leaving the testis cannot fertilize eggs. They must undergo a series of modifications in the epididymis and then in the female reproductive tract (capacitation [CA]) to become fully competent to fertilize an ovum (Austin, 1951, 1952; Chang, 1951). Among the most frequently studied phenomena during this maturation process are the sperm surface changes and the segregation of certain proteins and lipids to specialized domains of the sperm plasma membrane (for a review, see Jones, 1999).

The seminal plasma of mammals is a complex biological mixture of various fluids in the male reproductive tract. It contains several proteins (Mann and Lutwak-Mann, 1981), some of which are adsorbed onto the surface of ejaculated sperm (Leeuw de et al, 1990; Metz et al, 1990; Desnoyers and Manjunath, 1992; Amann et al, 1999). Many of these proteins are secretory products of the seminal vesicle (Huarte et al, 1987; Aumuller et al, 1988; Chandonnet et al, 1990), an accessory reproductive gland in most male mammals, where they accumulate in the lumen after puberty. Some of the adsorbed proteins maintain the stability of the membrane until the process of CA in the female genital tract (Cross, 1996), when their removal is a prerequisite for fertilization (Desnoyers and Manjunath, 1992). Seminal plasma plays an important role in improving ram sperm viability (Ashworth et al, 1994; Maxwell et al, 1997), maintaining spermatozoa motility in the bull (Baas et al, 1983) and the ram (Graham, 1994), and increasing the resistance of boar spermatozoa to cold-shock damage (Pursel et al, 1973; Berger and Clegg, 1985). A sperm surface receptor for a seminal plasma protein that increases sperm motility and viability has been found in rabbit spermatozoa (Minelli et al, 2001a,b).

It is well known that low temperatures alter the function of spermatozoa (Watson, 1981). Cold shock results in the destabilization of sperm membranes and impairment of sperm function, and it is also well known that ram spermatozoa are more sensitive to cold-shock stress than are that of other species such as the bull, rabbit, and man (Watson, 1981; Holt and North, 1984; Fiser and Fairfull, 1989). It has been suggested that cold shock induces premature sperm CA (Ashworth et al, 1994; Fuller et al, 1994; Watson, 1995; Perez et al, 1996) and that the main role of seminal plasma is to maintain the spermatozoa in a decapacitated state (Cross, 1996).

In a previous work, we have shown that the adsorption of seminal plasma proteins on cold-shocked ram sperm plasma membranes modifies the functional characteristics of damaged spermatozoa, restoring them to a state similar to that of live cells (Barrios et al, 2000). Fractioning of ram seminal plasma proteins by exclusion chromatography provided 3 fractions that could reverse the cold-shock effect. The restoring capacity appeared to be due to 1 major protein band of about 20 kd (Barrios et al, 2000), and we have shown recently that this effect is related to the inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of sperm proteins during CA (Pérez-Pé et al, 2002). Moreover, we have proved that adding seminal plasma proteins to the medium before cold treatment has an immediate beneficial effect on sperm survival (Pérez-Pé et al, 2001). These results prompted us to further investigate the nature of the ram seminal plasma components that are responsible for maintaining sperm membrane functionality. In this study, we present data to demonstrate that 2 proteins of about 14 (P14) and 20 (P20) kd from ram seminal plasma can prevent cold-shock membrane damage. Since the decapacitating role is frequently demonstrated by protein release from the membrane at CA (Desnoyers and Manjunath, 1992), we have quantified these proteins and analyzed their distribution on the surface of fresh spermatozoa and the changes induced by CA and the acrosome reaction (AR). In addition, according to a partial analysis of the primary structure of both proteins, there was no significant similarity between P20 and protein sequences collected in the databank, so this protein is probably still undescribed. A hypothetical function for P14 is discussed in terms of the homology between this protein and bovine PDC-109 (Esch et al, 1983).


   Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Preparation of Cell Samples

All the experiments were performed using fresh ram spermatozoa. Semen was collected from 8 mature Rasa aragonesa rams using an artificial vagina. The rams belonged to the National Association of Rasa Aragonesa Breeding (ANGRA) and were 2 to 4 years old. They were kept at the Veterinary School under uniform nutritional conditions. Ethical guidelines have been followed in the animal care and conduct of the research. Second ejaculates were pooled and used for each assay. On the basis of results obtained in a previous study, sires underwent an abstinence period of 2 days (Ollero et al, 1996).

A seminal plasma–free sperm population was obtained by a dextran/swim-up procedure (García-López et al, 1996) performed at 37°C using a medium without Ca2Cl and NaHCO3 (Pérez-Pé et al, 2002). For thermal shock, aliquots of approximately 1 x 106 cells obtained after the swim-up process were incubated for 5 minutes at 25°C, transferred to 5°C for 10 minutes, and then replaced at 25°C for a further 5 minutes.

Evaluation of Semen Samples

Sperm concentration was calculated in duplicate with a Neubauer chamber (Marienfeld, Germany).

Cell viability (membrane integrity) was assessed by fluorescent staining with carboxyfluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, Mo) (Harrison and Vickers, 1990). The cells were then examined under a Nikon fluorescence microscope, and the numbers of propidium iodide-negative (membrane intact) spermatozoa and propidium iodide–positive (membrane damaged) spermatozoa per 100 cells were estimated and recorded. At least 200 cells were counted in duplicate for each sample. Results are expressed as the percentage of membrane-intact spermatozoa ± standard deviation.

Obtaining Seminal Plasma Proteins

Whole seminal plasma proteins and fraction 6 (F6) isolated by exclusion chromatography in Sephacryl-100 were obtained as described previously (Barrios et al, 2000). To separate the F6 component bands as much as possible, we used a 15% to 20% preparative, nondenaturing, gradient polyacrylamide gel. Two lanes were loaded with the same F6 sample in identical conditions, and we cut and stained one of them with Coomassie blue to use as a reference to cut the separated bands from the other lane. Thus, 2 major components of this fraction with an approximate relative molecular weight of 14 (P14) and 20 (P20) kd were recovered from the gel (by cutting and mincing) and obtained by electroelution in a 422 ElectroEluter (BioRad, Hercules, Calif) under nondenaturing conditions (without sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) for 6 hours. The proportion of P14 and P20 varied during the year. The medium value was 11.6 ± 3.1 (% P14) and 88.2 ± 3.2 (% P20).

Protein concentration was determined according to the method described by Bradford (1976), and samples were stored at -20°C.

Assessment of Seminal Plasma Protein Effect

The protective effects of the 8 protein fractions obtained from 2 exclusion chromatography columns (Barrios et al, 2000) were analyzed by incubating 1.4 mg of each fraction with sperm samples (106 sperm in 500 µL) for 30 minutes at 20°C before coldshock treatment to assist with the adsorption of protein onto the surface of the sperm (Pérez-Pé et al, 2001). A control containing bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used. Sperm membrane integrity was analyzed immediately after cold-shock treatment, since a previous study of ours has demonstrated that no differences were found after 1 hour of incubation (Pérez-Pé et al, 2001). F6 had the highest ability to prevent cold-shock membrane damage (data not shown). Therefore, the whole F6 and both P14 and P20 bands isolated from this fraction, as described above, were diluted with the swim-up medium, and their protective effect on spermatozoa was evaluated. Results were expressed as the percentage of membrane-intact spermatozoa (ie, propidium iodide negative). The data were compared using analysis of variance. Post hoc comparisons were made using Tukey's significant difference test. The software used was GraphPad InStat (San Diego, Calif).

Induction of CA and AR

Aliquots of approximately 1 x 106 cells obtained after the swim-up process (García-López et al, 1996) were diluted to 0.5 mL with BSA-depleted swim-up medium to avoid premature CA of the control sample. In vitro CA was performed by incubating the samples (containing 5 mg/mL of BSA) for 4 hours at 39°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 in air, as reported previously (Pérez-Pé et al, 2002). The control was incubated under these conditions without the addition of BSA. The chlortetracycline assay was used to assess the CA state as described (Pérez-Pé et al, 2002) and was based on the technique developed by Ward and Storey (1984).

For the ionophore-induced AR, calcium ionophore A23187 was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and added to 20 µL of raw semen diluted 1:200 (2 x 107 cells/mL) with HEPES glucose buffer (149 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM glucose, 20 mM HEPES, and 3 mM CaCl2). The pH was adjusted with NaOH to 7.4 (Shams-Borhan and Harrison, 1981). The final concentration of A23187 was 1 µM and 0.3% DMSO. DMSO was added to control tubes without ionophore—conditions that were shown not to have a protective effect (data not shown). The samples were incubated at 39°C for 1 hour, after which we assessed the acrosomal status and cell viability.

Extraction of Proteins

Sperm proteins were extracted (Harayama et al, 1999) by centrifuging 4 x 107 spermatozoa in a microfuge at 600 x g for 8 minutes at room temperature. The pellet was resuspended with 300 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged again. The pellet was resuspended with 100 µL of PBS and 100 µL of extraction buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 10% ß-mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol, and 0.02% bromophenol blue) and, after incubation at 100°C in a sand bath for 4 minutes, was centrifuged again at 7500 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was recovered and, after adding 10% of a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), was stored at -20°C.

SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blot Analysis

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), gel staining, and densitometric analyses were carried out as previously described (Barrios et al, 2000).

For Western blot analysis, polyclonal antibodies were raised against the whole F6 and the purified P14 and P20 bands by rabbit immunization with 500 µg of F6 and 300 µg of P14 and P20 protein in Freund complete adjuvant. After 15 days, they were reimmunized with the same amount of antigen dissolved in Freund incomplete adjuvant. The antiserum was obtained 15 days after the second immunization by the centrifugation of 10 to 20 mL of blood from each rabbit and purification by protein G affinity chromatography.

Immunoblots were carried out with 25 to 100 µg of protein using 7% to 22% SDS-PAGE and then transferred for 2 hours onto a polyvinylidine difluoride (PVDF) membrane with a Hoe-fer TE70 Semiphor Semidry-Transfer Unit (Pharmacia-Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Nonspecific sites on the membranes were blocked for 1 hour with 5% BSA in blocking buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8; 120 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween). The proteins were immunodetected by incubating for 3 hours with the polyclonal antibodies diluted at 1:3500 (F6) and 1:500 (P14 and P20) in blocking buffer that contained 0.17% BSA. After exhaustive washing, the blots were incubated with a secondary goat antirabbit alkaline phosphatase–conjugated immunoglobulin G (IgG; Sigma) at a dilution 1:30 000 for 2 hours. After 4 washings of 5 minutes each, the membranes were incubated with 66 µg/mL of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP) and 111 µg/mL of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) in 0.19 M Tris, 1 mM MgCl2 until color appeared. The image was scanned, and a densitometric analysis was carried out. The Gel Doc System with Molecular Analyst software (BioRad) was used to quantify the changes in intensity of various bands. The second antibody alone was used as a control to rule out the possibility of nonspecific binding to the transferred proteins.

Immunocytochemistry

Glass coverslips that were 13 mm in diameter coated with poly-L-lysine were used for the immunolocalization of P14 and P20 in control, capacitated, and acrosome-reacted sperm. Aliquots of 159 µL of 1 mg/mL of poly-L-lysine in PBS were loaded on coverslips previously washed with ethanol and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. After drawing off the poly-L-lysine solution with a pipette, the coverslips were washed with distilled water, air dried, and sterilized with a 254-nm ultraviolet light for 15 minutes. Sperm samples containing about 0.5 x 105 cells in 300 µL of medium were incubated for 10 minutes with 4% form-aldehyde, placed on the coverslips, and centrifuged for 8 minutes at 400 x g in a Jouan BR4 centrifuge (DEC Inc, Lorton, Va) with a Jouan S20 microtiter rotor. After being washed twice (5 minutes each) with sterile PBS, nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS (300 µL) for 30 minutes at 37°C and washed again with sterile PBS. Samples were exposed to 250 µL of the primary antibodies (1:75 anti-P20 and 1:150 anti-P14) in PBS/1% BSA for 1 hour at 37°C. After being washed 3 times with PBS, samples were stained for 2 hours in the dark at room temperature with 250 µL (1/1000) Alexa fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) in PBS/1% BSA, washed as above and dried at room temperature, and mounted over 1 mg/mL p-phenylendiamine in 90% glycerol (Oriol and Mancilla-Jimenez, 1983). To rule out any nonspecific binding to the sperm surface, a control using the second antibody alone was performed.

Sperm were evaluated with an E-400 Nikon epifluorescent light microscope (Tokyo, Japan) interfaced with a Sony digital power HAD camera (Carson, Calif), and fluorescence images were photographed (40x and 100x).

NH2-Terminal Sequencing

Aliquots of 5 to 10 µg of purified P14 and P20 were used for NH2 terminal sequencing on an Edman automatic sequencer (Protein Chemistry Service, CBM Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain) with the reagents and methods recommended by the manufacturer. The amount of the sample limited the number of cycles and subsequently the number of sequenced amino acids. Homology was analyzed using the Expasy Molecular Server and BLAST software (Altschul et al, 1990).

Glycosylation Analysis

Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred onto a PVDF membrane, and the glycosylated proteins were visualized with an immunoblot-based glycoprotein detection kit (ECL Glycoprotein Detection System, Amersham Biosciences, Barcelona, Spain) using a streptavidine-alkaline-phosphatase conjugate (BioRad). Transferrine was included in 1 well as a positive control. For the negative control, 1 lane was cut from the membrane and incubated as the rest of the membrane but without the periodate treatment.

Phosphorylation Analysis

Proteins that were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane were analyzed to detect phosphorylation on their Tyr, Ser, or Thr residues. The blots were blocked as described above and incubated with the appropriate dilutions for each monoclonal antibody (Sigma): 1:3000 (antiphospho-tyrosine, mouse IgG1 clone PT 66); 1:1000 (antiphospho-serine, mouse IgG1 clone PSR 45, and -threonine, mouse IgG2b clone PTR 8) for 2 hours at 25°C. After an exhaustive washing, the membranes were incubated for 1 hour with a secondary goat anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase–conjugated IgG (Sigma) diluted 1:2500 in blocking buffer and then washed and incubated with the reagents BCIP and NBT, as described above, to develop the colored reaction. The images were scanned, and densitometric analysis was carried out. The specificity of the antiphosphoserine and -threonine antibody was checked by using Flavodoxin from Chlorella (negative control [Peleato et al, 1994], a kind gift from Dr L. A. Inda) and {alpha}-bovine casein (positive control, Sigma). Further, the second antibody alone was used as a control to rule out nonspecific binding to the transferred proteins.



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Coomassie brilliant blue–stained protein bands separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Each lane was loaded with 15 µg of protein. Lane 1, molecular-weight markers (x10-3); lane 2, whole ram seminal plasma; lane 3, F6 obtained from chromatography on Sephacryl-100 HR; lane 4, P14; lane 5, P20. A representative experiment is shown.

 

   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Seminal Plasma Proteins Protect Sperm Plasma Membrane Against Cold-Shock Damage

Fresh ram spermatozoa that had been removed from seminal plasma by a dextran/swim-up procedure (García-López et al, 1996) were used to determine the effect that seminal plasma proteins would have against cold-shock membrane damage. The cold-shock treatment strongly decreased cell viability (membrane integrity by fluorescence markers) (Table). Adding whole seminal plasma proteins (>3 kd) to the medium before the cold treatment had an immediate beneficial effect on sperm survival. Among the 8 seminal plasma protein fractions separated by exclusion chromatography on Sephacryl-100 HR (Barrios et al, 2000), F6 had the greatest ability to prevent cold-shock membrane damage (data not shown). Adding 1.4 mg of F6 protein to 106 sperm (500 µL) before the cold treatment increased sperm survival up to 33.1% but only 5.1% in control samples containing the same amount of BSA (Table). SDS-PAGE analysis of this fraction (Figure 1) showed 2 major protein bands, 1 faint band of approximately 14 kd (P14) and 1 prominent band with an apparent molecular weight of 20.5 kd, together with 1 fainter band of approximately 22 kd. Since the 20.5- and 22- kd bands tended to migrate together, they were recovered as a "doublet" by electroelution from a nondenaturing gel to obtain the band called P20. The addition of either P14 or P20 before cold treatment increased sperm resistance to damage and preserved membrane integrity to a degree similar to that observed for the whole F6 (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Effect of the addition of 1.4 mg of protein before the cold-shock treatment on ram sperm survival; mean ± SD of intact-membrane spermatozoa of the assay number indicated in brackets*
 

Content of P14 and P20 on the Ram Sperm Membrane

To investigate whether the protective effect of P14 and P20 was related to the decapacitation role played by some seminal plasma proteins, we carried out a comparative analysis of the changes that in vitro CA and the AR had on the quantity of both of these proteins on the surface of ram spermatozoa. Proteins from the sperm membrane were extracted with detergent, and the contents of P14 and P20 were analyzed by Western blotting (Figure 2). CA had a greater effect on the quantity of P20 that was released from the membrane once the process was begun, with about 37% remaining after 5 hours of incubation under capacitating conditions (Figure 2C and D). However, nearly 70% of P14 persisted on the sperm membrane after 5 hours of incubation (Figure 2A and B). The induction of the AR accounted for an additional release of both proteins, with not more than 35% remaining on the acrosome-reacted sperm (Figure 2B and D, lane 6).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes induced by in vitro capacitation (CA) and the acrosome reaction (AR) on the content of P14 and P20 on the ram sperm surface. (A) Western blot analysis using polyclonal antibody to P14 and (B) densitometric quantification (percent related to the control samples) of corresponding areas of the sperm protein extracted from control (lane 2) and capacitated samples after 90, 180, and 300 minutes of incubation (lanes 3, 4, and 5, respectively) and the AR (lane 6). (C) Western blot analysis using a polyclonal antibody to P20 and (D) densitometric quantification (percent related to the control samples) of corresponding areas of sperm protein extracted from the control (control, lane 2) and capacitated samples after 90, 180, and 300 minutes of incubation (lanes 3, 4, and 5, respectively) and the AR (lane 6). Control samples (without bovine serum albumin [BSA]) were incubated at the same time at 39°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Molecular-weight markers (x103) lanes 1 (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS-PAGE] stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, (A and C) and indicated to the left (B and D). Sperm proteins were extracted from 4 x 107 spermatozoa. The bars in Panels B and D represent the means of 3 replicate experiments. *P < .001.

 

Immunolocalization of P14 and P20 on the Sperm Surface

Since CA and the AR modified the content of both protein bands on the sperm membrane, we investigated the changes induced by these processes on the distribution of P14 and P20 on the cell surface.

Immunocytochemical localization and relative distribution analysis of P14 and P20 on control sperm samples showed that both proteins are localized on several surface domains. The percentage of differently immunostained subpopulations is shown in Figure 3A. The main sperm subpopulations in the control samples showed P14 labeling on the entire cell surface (34%) (Figure 3B1, pattern W) as well as on the acrosomal region (Figure 3B1, pattern A), either alone (26%) or with additional labeling on the equatorial and/or the flagellum (27%) regions. Other minor subpopulations showed immunofluorescence on the entire flagellum (Figure 3B1, pattern T) or head (Figure 3B1, pattern H). Similarly, the major subpopulations in the control spermatozoa had P20 labeling at the acrosomal region (about 46%) (Figure 3B2, patterns A-T and A-E) and the entire cell surface (31%) (Figure 3B2, pattern W). A minor subpopulation showed fluorescence at the postacrosomal region and the intermediate piece (Figure 3B2, pattern P). These results were highly specific, because replacing the antiserum with preimmune serum eliminated protein detection.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Proportion of differently immunostained subpopulations (A) and indirect immunofluorescence labeling patterns of main sperm subpopulations (B) in control sperm samples using polyclonal antibodies to P14 (1) or P20 (2). Sperm samples containing about 0.5 x 105 cells were stained, and a total of 200 spermatozoa were evaluated. Percent related to all positive spermatozoa. A indicates acrosomal; E, equatorial; A-E, acrosomal and equatorial; T, flagellum; A-T, acrosomal and flagellum; P, postacrosomal; H, head; and W, hole cell. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of 4 experiments.

 
A different distribution of P14 and P20 was evident after in vitro CA (Figure 4) and AR (Figure 5). CA had a greater effect on P20 localization, changing the percentages of the immunostained subpopulations due to protein redistribution toward the postequatorial region, thus increasing labeling on the head and flagellum (Figure 4B). The P14 distribution was also affected by CA, and the proportion of sperm with fluorescence on the entire cell surface also increased (Figure 4A). The cellular migration pattern of the P14 and P20 proteins was enhanced after the induction of the AR (Figure 5A and B). A significant decrease in flagellum labeling and an increase in the labeling on the acrosomal and equatorial regions (A-E) and the entire cell surface were observed for both proteins. Nearly 3 times (P14) or twice (P20) the number of acrosome-reacted cells displayed fluorescence at the acrosomal and equatorial regions (pattern A-E) than the control cells (containing DMSO). Moreover, a major subpopulation of reacted cells continued to display immunofluorescence on the entire cell surface.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Redistribution of P14 (A) and P20 (B) on the sperm surface after in vitro capacitation. Control ({blacksquare}) and capacitated ({square}) samples were assessed for different labeling patterns (%) using polyclonal antibodies to P14 or P20. A indicates acrosomal; E, equatorial; W, whole cell surface; T, flagellum; H, head; A-T, acrosomal and tail; A-E, acrosomal and equatorial; and P, postacrosomal. Mean ± SEM of 3 experiments. *P < .001.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Redistribution of P14 (A) and P20 (B) on the sperm surface after an induced acrosome reaction. Fresh ({blacksquare}), control (dimethylsulfoxide [DMSO], {cjs2090}), and acrosome-reacted ({cjs2098}) samples were assessed for different labeling patterns (%) using polyclonal antibodies to P14 or P20. A indicates acrosomal; E, equatorial; W, whole cell surface; T, flagellum; H, head; A-T, acrosomal and tail; A-E, acrosomal and equatorial; and P, postacrosomal. Mean ± SEM of 3 experiments. *P < .001.

 

Sequence Analysis

Automated Edman degradation of P14 and P20 gave reliable data, which indicated Asp as the N-terminal residue of both proteins, and 34 and 29 amino acids were obtained for P14 and P20, respectively. The N-terminal sequence of P14 is: NH2-D-D-E-L-T-R-D-K-S-S-E-E-S-H-E-D-E-E-C-V-F-P-F-T-Y-Y-D-D-R-H-F-D-C-T-. This sequence was performed twice until amino acid 35 was reached and at least 4 times for the first 10 amino acids. Sequencing cycles at 9 and 33 did not produce any amino acid peaks, and they were putatively assigned as cysteine.

Comparative sequence analysis (Expasy Molecular Server) showed a relationship between P14 and several proteins and showed the highest homology with PDC-109 (also called BSP-A1/A2 or SFP1-Bovin), a protein secreted by the seminal vesicles that modulates bovine sperm CA (Manjunath and Sairam, 1987; Thérien et al, 1997; Gwathmey et al, 2003). Alignment of the N-terminal amino acid sequences of P14 and PDC-109 (Protein Data Bank) showed that P14 contains a part of the Fibronectin Domain Type II, from amino acid 19 to at least 34 (49 to 64 of 134 amino acids contained by PDC-109). This domain has been conserved during evolution, as it is found in the proteins of the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix of eucaryotic, metazoan, and chordate organisms and is mainly involved in collagen linkage.

For the N-terminal sequencing of P20, although we had sampled only the 20.5-kd prominent band, a slight contamination with the 22-kd protein could have occurred, probably due to the presence of hydrophobic domains (shown by partition in a 2-phase system with Triton X-114 [data not shown]), which could account for their tendency to aggregate. Another possibility is that both bands correspond to the same protein with a different degree of glycosylation. Therefore, we also found small peaks (very low concentration) of a minor band sequence. The main sequence that certainly corresponded to the major 20.5-kd protein band was NH2-D-E-P-L-P-D-V-Y-D-V-L-G-M-L-C-C-T-W-S-Y-Y-Y-A-D-Q-G-G-P-P- (this sequence was performed twice). Sequencing cycles at 15 and 16 did not produce any amino acid peaks, and they were putatively assigned as cysteine. This N-terminal sequence did not appear to be homologous with any known protein in the current ProteinBank databases.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Western blot analysis of F6, P14, and P20 separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto a polyvinylidine difluoride (PVDF) membrane. (A) Glycoprotein detection kit using a streptavidin-alkaline-phosphatase conjugate. Molecular-weight markers (lane 1); transferrin (positive control, lane 2); F6 (lane 3). (B) Phosphoprotein detection using monoclonal antibodies to phosphotyrosine (lane 2), serine (lane 3), and threonine (lane 4). Molecular-weight markers (lane 1). (C) Flavodoxin from Chlorella (negative control: phosphoserine lane 2, and phosphothreonine lane 4); {alpha}-bovine casein (positive control: phosphoserine lane 3, and phosphothreonine lane 5); molecular-weight markers (lane 1). Gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis were carried out as detailed under "Materials and Methods."

 
P14 and P20 were subjected to protease treatment with trypsin to obtain internal sequences. However, no degradation was detected by SDS-PAGE. To prove the protein nature of these bands, the whole F6 and the purified P14 and P20 bands were treated with proteinase K to degrade the protein into its constituent amino acids. Both proteins were fully proteolyzed, since no band was subsequently detected by SDS-PAGE or Western blot analysis (data not shown). The presence of a protease contaminant in the enzyme preparation is unlikely, since protease inhibitors were included in the reaction, and the electrophoretic mobilities of the control proteins were unaffected. These data confirm the proteic nature of the F6 elemental bands.

Biochemical Characterization

The analysis of the sequenced fragments of both proteins showed no possible sites of glycosylation, although P14 was predicted to possibly be bound to N-acetyl glucosamine. We found that P14, separated in the polyacrylamide gel from F6 and transferred onto a PVDF membrane, did not contain any carbohydrate residue, which indicates that it is not a glycoprotein. However, P20 showed an intense labeling of glycosylation (Figure 6A).

The prediction of phosphorylation of both N-terminal sequenced fragments showed that P14 could have 3 residues of serine and 2 of threonine that could be phosphorylated, while P20 could have only 1 phosphorylated tyrosine. In an attempt to further characterize these proteins, the components of F6 obtained in the presence of 200 µM of sodium orthovanadate, a powerful phosphatase inhibitor (Gordon, 1991; Viñals et al, 2001), were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane, and phosphoproteins were immunodetected using anti-phosphotyrosine, anti-phosphoserine, and anti-phosphothreonine antibodies. Only P14 was phosphorylated at serine and threonine residues (Figure 6B).


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The fertilizing capacity of sperm requires an integral and functional plasma membrane. Preservation of these characteristics is especially crucial after stressful procedures such as freezing and storage. There is considerable evidence that cooling, among others processes, alters the function of spermatozoa and that some of these effects may be associated with the removal of seminal plasma (Maxwell and Johnson, 1999).

We have already shown that whole seminal plasma proteins and one of its fractions separated by exclusion chromatography (F6) can repair cold-shock damage in ram spermatozoa (Barrios et al, 2000). In the present work, we prove that the addition of F6 before cold-shock treatment prevents sperm membrane injury and that 2 protein bands of approximately 14 and 20 kd are responsible for this protective effect.

The adsorption of specific components of seminal plasma onto the surface of ejaculated sperm has been reported in several studies (Metz et al, 1990; Desnoyers and Manjunath, 1992; Manjunath et al, 1993; Amann et al, 1999). These sperm-coating components could play an important role in CA and/or sperm transport (Cross, 1996). Some of these components could stabilize the membrane during critical time frames, whereas others ultimately could contribute to exocytosis (membrane loss).

Results of this investigation indicate that whole ram seminal plasma proteins (>3 kd) and the F6 obtained by exclusion chromatography (Barrios et al, 2000) are adsorbed onto the sperm surface and significantly improve cold-shocked sperm survival. The beneficial effect of the inclusion of seminal plasma proteins into the cold-shock medium is specific for such proteins, since the viability of control samples with only BSA as a supplement was strongly decreased as a consequence of the cold-shock treatment. Moreover, it was necessary to add BSA to samples that did not contain plasma proteins to avoid cells sticking to the tube wall during cold-shock, which significantly affected results.

We have shown that the addition of either F6 or either of the 2 protein bands isolated from this fraction (P14 or P20) before cold shock increased sperm resistance to damage. Analysis of the quantity of P14 and P20 on the surface of ram spermatozoa indicated that their protective effect could be related to their membrane stabilizing effect. We could hypothesize that this protective effect is related to the decapacitating role reported for some seminal plasma proteins, which can be deduced by protein release from the membrane at CA (Desnoyers and Manjunath, 1992). That P20 is released from the membrane once CA begins could suggest a decapacitating role for this protein, where its partial loss could contribute to the onset of CA. Conversely, the induction of the AR had a greater effect on the quantity of P14 that was released than P20. About 35% of each protein persisted on acrosome-reacted sperm, suggesting that both proteins are also involved in subsequent processes as gamete interactions.

To investigate further the physiological function of P14 and P20, we analyzed how their surface distribution was affected by the in vitro induction of CA and the AR. The results of the immunodetection of P14 and P20 on the sperm surface before and after the induction of these processes confirm that the induced membrane alterations account for a decrease in the quantity as well as the migration and redistribution of both proteins. Cytochemical observations showed that the sperm surface has several binding sites for P14 and P20. The main location of both proteins in the control samples (acrosomal membrane and flagellum) could suggest that they contribute to the regulation of CA and/or the AR and motility, respectively. The observation, according to the Western blot analysis of protein content and the immunocytochemical distribution study, that P20 was highly affected by CA would suggest the decapacitating role of this protein, as its loss occurs at the beginning of the CA. That CA and the AR induce the migration of both proteins to the equatorial and postequatorial region supports our previous observation of that some proportion of P14 and P20 still remains on the sperm surface after both processes and could be related to their role in gamete interactions.

The process of CA has been described as a series of largely uncharacterized cellular and molecular events that occur within the female reproductive tract and is required for the AR and fertilization (Yanagimachi, 1994). During the AR, the apical plasma membrane of the sperm head starts to fuse with the underlying outer acrosomal membrane at multiple sites, resulting in the dispersal of the acrosomal content (Saling et al, 1979). The equatorial plasma membrane area of the sperm head is not modified (Curry and Watson, 1995) because it does not participate in the fusions with the outer acrosomal membrane and seems to be the specific site involved in the oolemma interaction (Clark and Koehler, 1990; Yanagimachi, 1994; Flesch and Gadella, 2000). This remodeling could be the main reason for the redistribution of P14 and P20 reported in this study during CA and the AR. In vitro capacitated and acrosome-reacted ram sperm displayed a change in the cellular distribution of both proteins, more significant for P20, from the acrosome to the equatorial and post-equatorial regions in a large population of sperm. This protein redistribution could contribute to the exposition and binding of recognition residues, or the proteins could even act as a direct intermediate in fusion with the zona pellucida. These results are consistent with reports in several species regarding the redistribution of some proteins (Yanagimachi, 1994; Yudin et al, 1998; Meyers and Rosenberger, 1999; Cohen et al, 2000a,b; Lalancette et al, 2001) and decapacitating factors (Yanagimachi, 1994) during CA or the AR. Together, these results suggest that the protective effect of P14 and P20 is related to their decapacitating role. Moreover, their role in gamete interaction cannot be ruled out, as both proteins remain on the sperm surface after the in vitro induction of CA and the AR.

Although P14 and P20 have a similar capacity to protect sperm, the results of the comparative study of their amino acid sequences show that they do not seem to be homologous and appear to be different proteins. The P14-sequenced fragment showed a high identity with several seminal plasma proteins from different species, particularly bovine PDC-109 (Esch et al, 1983) (also called BSP A1/A2) (Manjunath and Sairam, 1987) and GSP-14/15 kd (goat seminal plasma protein, related to the bull seminal protein [BSP] family) (Villemure et al, 2003). PDC-109 has been reported to be involved in a first step toward the stabilization of the sperm membrane (Greube et al, 2001) and, subsequently, to participate, in the female tract, in CA by releasing cholesterol and binding high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and heparin (Thérien et al, 1998, 2001; Gwathmey et al, 2003).

Interestingly, the P14 sequenced fragment shares a high homology from amino acid 19 to 34 (CVFPFTYYDDRHFDCT) with 49 to 64 of PDC-109 (CVFPFVYRNRKHFDCT), which is a conserved domain in several proteins called FN2 (Fibronectin Domain Type II) (Greube et al, 2001). This is a collagen-binding domain that binds to different extracellular matrix and cytoskeleton components to stabilize the extracellular matrix and determine the shape of the cell and cytoskeleton organization. The FN2 domain is also found in proteins from different tissues (Plucienniczak et al, 1999) and the seminal plasma of different species such as the bull BSP family (Thérien et al, 1995), stallion HSP-1 (Calvete et al, 1995), boar pB1 (Calvete et al, 1997), and goat (Villemure et al, 2003), and it has been suggested that this domain plays a similar biological role in all cases because of the observed structural relationships.

The FN2 domain binds choline phospholipids and heparin and promotes the binding of the seminal plasma protein to the sperm membrane upon ejaculation (Desnoyers and Manjunath, 1992; Moreau et al, 1998; Muller et al, 1998). We could hypothesize that P14 takes part in the protein structure surrounding the spermatozoa in a way similar to that of fibronectin, stabilizing membrane phospholipids, and the cytoskeleton. The P14 protective effect might be due to the association of the protein with the sperm membrane in a way that would be instrumental in the production of a protective barrier, which might also involve the cytoskeleton. Additionally, we obtained evidence that P14 is partially released from the sperm membrane during CA, as has been reported for BSP proteins (Thérien et al, 2001), and is redistributed over the sperm surface. The implications of this migration are significant, and we suggest that P14 is involved in sperm CA and gamete interaction, a first step in the stabilization of the sperm membrane, and participates in the subsequent CA in the female reproductive tract by binding HDL and heparin in a way that is similar to BSP proteins (Thérien et al, 1998, 2001; Gwathmey et al, 2003).

That this protein is phosphorylated in its serine and threonine residues suggests a role in the regulation of the fertilization process, possibly through its dephosphorylation by membrane protein phosphatases.

Since the P20-sequenced fragment was not homologous with any reported protein, no information can be deduced about its possible function. By immunochemical analysis, we obtained evidence that P20 is a glycosylated protein and that it continues to reside, partially, on the sperm surface after CA and the AR. These results suggest a role in sperm CA and zona pellucida binding, as noted.

In conclusion, we have shown that 2 seminal plasma proteins of apparent molecular weights of 14 and 20 kd can protect ram spermatozoa against cold shock, and we suggest that these proteins are involved in the fertilization process. Further studies on the functional role of P14 and P20 would provide a better understanding of the molecular events of CA and reproductive mechanisms in rams.

The availability of these proteins could assist in the formulation of improved diluents for preserving ram spermatozoa during freezing or storage. Adding P14 and P20 to the semen extender could protect ram semen against cold shock during storage, allowing the storage of spermatozoa for extended periods and the improvement of cryopreservation methods.


   Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank ANGRA for supplying the sires, S. Morales for the collection of semen samples, and J. Medina and M. Cebrián for technical assistance with illustrations.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by grants CICYT-FEDER AGL 2002-00097, DGA GC-2003, INIA RZ03-035, and CICYT-FEDER AGL 2004-02882.


   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215: 403 -410.[CrossRef][Medline]

Amann RP, Hammerstedt RH, Shabanowitz RB. Exposure of human, boar or bull sperm to a synthetic peptide increases binding to a egg-membrane substrate. J Androl. 1999; 20: 34 -41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ashworth PJC, Harrison RAP, Miller NGA, Plummer JM, Watson PF. Survival of ram spermatozoa at high dilution: protective effect of simple constituents of culture media as compared with seminal plasma. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1994; 6: 173 -180.[CrossRef][Medline]

Aumuller G, Vesper M, Seitz J, Kemme M, Scheit KH. Binding of a major secretory protein from bull seminal vesicles to bovine spermatozoa. Cell Tissue Res. 1988; 252: 377 -384.[Medline]

Austin CR. Observations on the penetration of the sperm into the mammalian egg. Aust J Sci Res B. 1951; 4: 581 -592.

Austin CR. The "capacitation" of the mammalian sperm. Nature. 1952;170: 326 .[CrossRef][Medline]

Baas JW, Molan PC, Shannon P. Factors in seminal plasma of bulls that effect the viability and motility of spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1983;68: 275 -280.

Barrios B, Pérez-Pé R, Gallego M, Tato A, Osada J, Muiño-Blanco T, Cebrián-Pérez JA. Seminal plasma proteins revert the cold-shock damage on ram sperm membrane. Biol Reprod. 2000;63: 1531 -1537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berger T, Clegg E. Effect of male accessory gland secretions on sensitivity of porcine sperm acrosomes to cold shock. Initiation of motility and loss of cytoplasmic droplets. J Anim Sci. 1985; 60: 1295 -1302.

Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248 -254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Calvete JJ, Mann K, Schäfer W, Sanz L, Reinert M, Nessau S, Raida M, Topfer-Petersen E. Amino acid sequence of HSP-1, a major protein of stallion seminal plasma: effect of glycosilation on its heparin- and gelatin-binding capabilities. Biochem J. 1995; 310: 615 -620.

Calvete JJ, Raida M, Gentzel M, Urbanke C, Sanz L, Topfer-Petersen E. Elation and characterization of heparin- and phosphorylcholine-binding proteins of boar and stallion seminal plasma. Primary structure of porcine pB1. FEBS Lett. 1997; 407: 201 -206.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chandonnet L, Roberts KD, Chapdelaine A, Manjunath P. Identification of heparin-binding proteins in bovine seminal plasma. Mol Reprod Dev. 1990; 26: 313 -318.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chang MC. Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited in fallopian tubes. Nature. 1951; 168: 997 -998.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clark JM, Koehler JK. Observations of hamster sperm-egg fusion in freeze-fracture replicas including the use of filipin as a sterol marker. Mol Reprod Dev. 1990; 27: 351 -365.[Medline]

Cohen DJ, Ellerman DA, Cuasnicú PS. Mammalian sperm-egg fusion: evidence that epididymal protein DE plays a role in mouse gamete fusion. Biol Reprod. 2000a; 63: 462 -468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cohen DJ, Rochwerger L, Ellerman DA, Morgenfeld MM, Busso D, Cuasnicú PS. Relationship between the association of rat epididymal protein "DE" with spermatozoa and the behavior and function of the protein. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000b; 56: 180 -188.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cross NL. Human seminal plasma prevents sperm from becoming acrosomally responsive to the agonist, progesterone: cholesterol is the major inhibitor. Biol Reprod. 1996; 54: 138 -145.[Abstract]

Curry MR, Watson PF. Sperm structure and function. In: Grudzinskas JG, Yovich JL, eds. Gametes: The Spermatozoon. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1995: 45 -69.

Desnoyers L, Manjunath P. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma exhibit novel interactions with phospholipid. J Biol Chem. 1992;267: 10149 -10155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Esch FS, Ling NC, Bohlen P, Ying S, Guillemin R. Primary structure of PDC-109, a major protein constituent of bovine seminal plasma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1983; 113: 861 -867.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fiser PS, Fairfull RW. The effect of glycerol-related osmotic changes on post-thaw motility and acrosomal integrity of ram spermatozoa. Cryobiology. 1989; 26: 64 -69.[CrossRef][Medline]

Flesch FM, Gadella BM. Dynamics of the mammalian sperm plasma membrane in the process of fertilization. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2000;1469: 197 -235.[Medline]

Fuller SJ, Wood MJ, Whittingham DG, Watson PF. Cooling mouse sperm to 4°C does not affect fertilization or embryonic development. J Reprod Fertil. 1994; Abstract Series 14:8.

García-López N, Ollero M, Muiño-Blanco T, Cebrián-Pérez JA. A dextran swim-up procedure for the separation of highly motile and viable ram spermatozoa from seminal plasma. Theriogenology. 1996; 46: 141 -151.[CrossRef]

Gordon JA. Use of vanadate as protein-phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitor. Methods Enzymol. 1991; 201: 477 -482.[Medline]

Graham JK. Effect of seminal plasma on the motility of the epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa of the ram and bull during the cryopreservation process. Theriogenology. 1994; 41: 1151 -1162.

Greube A, Müller K, Töpfer-Petersen E, Herrmann A, Müller P. Influence of the bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 on the physical state of membranes. Biochemistry. 2001; 40: 8326 -8334.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gwathmey TM, Ignotz GG, Suarez SS. PDC-109 (BSP-A1/A2) promotes bull sperm binding to oviductal epithelium in vitro and may be involved in forming the oviductal sperm reservoir. Biol Reprod. 2003; 69: 809 -815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harayama H, Magargee S, Kunze E, Shidara O, Iwamoto E, Arikawa S, Miyake M, Kato S, Hammerstedt RH. Changes in epididymal protein anti-agglutinin on ejaculated boar spermatozoa during capacitation in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1999; 11: 193 -199.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harrison RAP, Vickers SE. Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;88: 343 -352.

Holt WV, North RD. Partially irreversible cold-induced lipid phase transitions in mammalian sperm plasma membrane domains: freeze-fracture study. J Exp Zool. 1984; 230: 473 -483.[CrossRef][Medline]

Huarte J, Belin D, Bosco D, Sappino AP, Vassalli JD. Plasminogen activator and mouse spermatozoa: urokinase synthesis in the male genital tract and binding of the enzyme to the sperm surface. J Cell Biol. 1987;104: 1281 -1289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones R. Plasma membrane structure and remodelling during sperm maturation in the epididymis. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999; 53: 73 -84.

Lalancette C, Dorval V, Leblanc V, Leclerc P. Characterization of an 80-kilodalton bull sperm protein identified as pH-20. Biol Reprod. 2001;65: 628 -636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leeuw de FE, Chen H-C, Colenbrander B, Verkleij AJ. Cold-induced ultrastructural changes in bull and boar sperm plasma membranes. Cryobiology. 1990; 27: 171 -183.[CrossRef][Medline]

Manjunath P, Chandonnet L, Leblond E, Desnoyers L. Major proteins of bovine seminal vesicles bind to spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1993;49: 27 -37.[CrossRef]

Manjunath P, Sairam MR. Purification and biochemical characterization of three major acidic proteins (BSP-A1, BSP-A2 and BSP-A3). Biochem J. 1987; 241: 685 -692.[Medline]

Mann T, Lutwak-Mann C. Male Reproductive Function and Semen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1981.

Maxwell WMC, Johnson LA. Physiology of spermatozoa at high dilution rates: the influence of seminal plasma. Theriogenology. 1999; 52: 1353 -1362.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maxwell WMC, Welch GR, Johnson LA. Viability and membrane integrity of spermatozoa after dilution and flow cytometric sorting in the presence or absence of seminal plasma. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997; 8: 1165 -1178.

Metz KW, Berger T, Clegg ED. Adsorption of seminal plasma proteins by boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 1990; 34: 691 -700.

Meyers S, Rosenberger AE. A plasma membrane-associated hyaluronidase is localized to the posterior acrosomal region of stallio sperm and is associated with spermatozoal function. Biol Reprod. 1999;61: 444 -451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Minelli A, Liguori L, Collodel G, Lattaioli P, Castellini C. Effects of the purified IGF-I complex on the capacitation and acrosome reaction of rabbit spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 2001a; 290: 311 -317.[Medline]

Minelli A, Moroni M, Castellini C. Isolation and purification of the IGF-I protein complex from rabbit seminal plasma: effects on sperm motility and viability. J Exp Zool. 2001b; 279-290.

Moreau R, Thérien I, Manjunath P. Type II domains of BSP-A1/A2 proteins: binding properties, lipid efflux, and sperm capacitation potential. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 246: 148 -154.[CrossRef][Medline]

Muller P, Erlemann KR, Muller K, Calvete JJ, Topfer-Petersen E, Marienfeld K, Hemann A. Biochemical characterization of the bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 with phospholipid vesicles. Eur Bio-phys J. 1998;27: 33 -41.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ollero M, Muiño-Blanco T, López-Pérez M, Cebrián-Pérez JA. Viability of ram spermatozoa in relation to the abstinence period and successive ejaculations. Int J Androl. 1996;19: 287 -292.[Medline]

Oriol R, Mancilla-Jimenez R. Fluorescent staining of nuclei and amyloid substance: two useful properties of p-phenylendiamine. J Immunol Methods. 1983;62: 185 -190.[Medline]

Peleato ML, Ayora S, Inda LA, Gómez-Moreno C. Isolation and characterization of two different flavodixins from the eukaryote Chlorella fusca. Biochem J. 1994; 302: 807 -811.

Perez LJ, Valcarcel A, Delasheras MA, Moses D, Baldassarre H. Evidence that frozen/thawed ram spermatozoa show accelerated capacitation in vitro as assessed by chlortetracycline assay. Theriogenology. 1996; 46: 131 -140.[CrossRef]

Pérez-Pé R, Cebrián-Pérez JA, Muino-Blanco T. Semen plasma proteins prevent cold-shock membrane damage to ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2001; 56: 425 -434.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pérez-Pé R, Grasa P, Fernández-Juan M, Peleato ML, Cebrián-Pérez JA, Muino-Blanco T. Seminal plasma proteins reduce protein tyrosine phosphorylation in the plasma membrane of cold-shocked ram spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002; 61: 226 -233.[CrossRef][Medline]

Plucienniczak G, Jagiello A, Plucienniczak A. Cloning of complementary DNA encoding the pB1 component of the 54-kilodalton glycoprotein of boar seminal plasma. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999; 52: 303 -309.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pursel VG, Johnson LA, Schulman LL. Effect of dilution, seminal plasma and incubation period on cold shock susceptibility of boar spermatozoa. J Anim Sci. 1973; 37: 528 -531.

Saling PM, Sowinski J, Storey BT. An ultrastructural study of epididymal mouse spermatozoa binding to zonae pellucidae in vitro: sequential relationship to the acrosome reaction. J Exp Zool. 1979; 209: 229 -238.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shams-Borhan G, Harrison RAP. Production, characterization, and use of ionophore-induced, calcium-dependent acrosome reaction in ram spermatozoa. Gamete Res. 1981; 4: 407 -432.[CrossRef]

Thérien I, Bleau G, Manjunath P. Phosphatidylcholine-binding proteins of bovine seminal plasma modulate capacitation of spermatozoa by heparin. Biol Reprod. 1995; 52: 1372 -1379.[Abstract]

Thérien I, Bousquet D, Manjunath P. Effect of seminal phospholipid-binding proteins and follicular fluid on bovine sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod. 2001; 65: 41 -51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thérien I, Moreau R, Manjunath P. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma and high-density lipoprotein induce cholesterol efflux from epididymal sperm. Biol Reprod. 1998; 59: 768 -776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thérien I, Soubeyrand S, Manjunath P. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma modulate sperm capacitation by high-density lipoprotein. Biol Reprod. 1997; 57: 1080 -1088.[Abstract]

Villemure M, Lazure C, Manjunath P. Isolation and characterization of gelatin-binding proteins from goat seminal plasma. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1: 39 -49.[CrossRef][Medline]

Viñals F, McKenzie R, Pouysségur J. Growth factor–stimulated protein synthesis is inhibited by sodium orthovanadate. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268: 2308 -2314.[Medline]

Ward CR, Storey BT. Determination of the time course of capacitation in mouse spermatozoa using a chlortetracycline fluorescent assay. Dev Biol. 1984; 104: 287 -296.[CrossRef][Medline]

Watson PF. The effects of cold shock on sperm cell membranes. In: Morris GJ, Clarke A, eds. Effects of Low Temperatures on Biological Membranes. London: Academic Press; 1981: 189 -218.

Watson PF. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995; 7: 871 -891.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yanagimachi R. Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, eds. The Physiology of Reproduction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994: 189 -317.

Yudin AI, Cherr GN, Vandevoort CA, Overstreet JW. Rearrangement of the PH-20 protein on the surface of macaque spermatozoa following exposure to anti-PH-20 antibodies or binding to zona pellucida. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;50: 207 -220.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Hernandez, J. Roca, J. J. Calvete, L. Sanz, T. Muino-Blanco, J. A. Cebrian-Perez, J. M. Vazquez, and E. A. Martinez
Cryosurvival and In Vitro Fertilizing Capacity Postthaw Is Improved When Boar Spermatozoa Are Frozen in the Presence of Seminal Plasma From Good Freezer Boars
J Androl, September 1, 2007; 28(5): 689 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
I. Caballero, J. M. Vazquez, E. M. Garcia, J. Roca, E. A. Martinez, J. J. Calvete, L. Sanz, H. Ekwall, and H. Rodriguez-Martinez
Immunolocalization and Possible Functional Role of PSP-I/PSP-II Heterodimer in Highly Extended Boar Spermatozoa
J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 766 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Fernandez-Juan, M. Gallego, B. Barrios, J. Osada, J. A. Cebrian-Perez, and T. Muino-Blanco
Immunohistochemical Localization of Sperm-Preserving Proteins in the Ram Reproductive Tract
J Androl, July 1, 2006; 27(4): 588 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S.S. Suarez and A. A. Pacey
Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 23 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrios, B.
Right arrow Articles by Cebrián-Pérez, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation