| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |





From the * Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and the
Division of Reproductive Biology, Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg
School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
| Correspondence to: Dr Jonathan P. Jarow, Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Helsinki, 601 North Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (e-mail: jjarow{at}jhmi.edu). |
| Received for publication June 20, 2004; accepted for publication December 7, 2004. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Intratesticular testosterone, infertility, human
Testosterone is the predominant intratesticular steroid in the testes of both the rat (Turner et al, 1984) and man (Morse et al, 1973; Huhtaniemi et al, 1987; Jarow et al, 2001; McLachlan et al, 2002). The concentration of the biologically active metabolite of testosterone, 5-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), is 5% that of testosterone in the rat testis (Turner et al, 1984) and 2% that of testosterone in the human testis (McLachlan et al, 2002). Prior studies in the rat have shown that the normal total intratesticular testosterone concentration, 50-70 ng/mL, is significantly higher than the 20 ng/mL concentration shown experimentally to be required for the quantitative maintenance of spermatogenesis (Zirkin et al, 1989) or for its quantitative restoration in rats that had been rendered azoospermic by testosterone administration or active immunization against GnRH (Awoniyi et al, 1989). The requisite threshold of 20 ng/mL, although less than 50% of the testosterone concentration that is normally present within the rat testis, nonetheless is 10-fold higher than the total testosterone concentration in normal rat serum (2 ng/mL). In part, the explanation for the need for relatively high concentrations of testosterone in the rat testis may be that at least some of the testosterone is bound to proteins in the seminiferous tubular fluid and therefore that only a fraction of the total testosterone is bioactive (Roberts and Zirkin, 1993).
Until recently, a major problem in conducting comparable studies on the hormonal regulation of human spermatogenesis has been the lack of minimally invasive methods suitable for repeatedly obtaining intratesticular fluids from the human testis. We recently reported the development of such a method, percutaneous aspiration of the human testis (Jarow et al, 2001). Using this method, we found that, as in the rat, the mean total testosterone concentration within the human testis, about 600 ng/mL, is well in excess of the average testosterone concentration in serum (5 ng/mL). We originally reported that DHT concentration in the human testis was below the limit of detection by routine radioimmunoassay (RIA) procedures (Jarow et al, 2001). Subsequently, using more sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), we found that the concentration of DHT in human testicular fluid is about 2% that of testosterone (unpublished data). Our results are consistent with previous findings by McLachlan and associates (McLachlan et al, 2002), who were able to measure both testosterone and DHT by RIA, since they had larger volume samples obtained by testicular biopsy.
The serum hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)/ABP that is present in intratesticular fluid is thought to bind androgens and thereby to reduce androgen bioactivity. However, there is virtually no information on the percentage of free and/or biologically active androgens within the testis. Herein we report on the adaptation of a recently described recombinant protein mammalian cell bioassay (Raivio et al, 2001) that is sensitive enough to be used for the measurement of bioactive androgen concentrations in the small volumes of testicular fluids collected by percutaneous aspiration from normal, fertile men.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunoassays![]()
Immunoreactive testosterone concentrations were measured in testicular
fluid aspirates and in blood serum by RIA in duplicate samples, as previously
described in detail (Khan et al,
1982; Chen et al,
1994). The sensitivity of the RIA for testosterone was 10 pg/tube,
with interassay and intra-assay coefficients of variation of 11.2% and 9.6%,
respectively. SHBG and testicular fluid SHBG/ABP were measured using a
commercially available kit (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories Inc, Webster,
Tex). The RIA used to measure SHBG does not distinguish between ABP and SHBG.
According to the manufacturer, the sensitivity of the SHBG/ABP assay is 3
nmol/L; inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were less than
12% and 5%, respectively. All samples were assayed simultaneously and run in
duplicate.
Mammalian Cell Recombinant Protein Interaction Bioassay for Androgens![]()
We adapted the mammalian cell recombinant protein interaction bioassay of
Ravio and co-workers (Raivio et al,
2001) to measure bioactive androgen concentrations in serum and
testicular fluid. Major advantages of this assay are its specificity and the
fact that it can be used to assay bioactive androgen concentrations in
small-volume samples. The bioactivity assays were conducted using COS-7 monkey
kidney cells grown in Dalbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) culture media.
The media contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) on day 1 to allow growth and
attachment of cells following plating; on day 2, the cells were washed with
serum-free media and subsequently maintained in serum-free DMEM media
throughout DNA transfection in the presence of lipofectamine (see below).
Following transfection, the serum-free media was replaced with media
containing 5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FBS. On day 3, fresh media
containing 5% stripped FBS was added to each well. The final volume of the
culture media was 250 µL/well, inclusive of the sample volume. Samples,
including testicular fluid and serum, were added to the wells. Testosterone
used for the standard curve was 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0 nM. The
standard curve was consistently linear, with an R2 = 0.99
in a typical run.
To perform the assay, the COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids to express recombinant proteins of the N-terminus of the androgen receptor (AR) fused to the VP16 activation domain, the C-terminal ligand binding domain of AR fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain, the AR coactivator ARIP3, and a firefly luciferase reporter under the regulation of 5 Gal4 binding sites (pG5-LUC). In brief, the specific binding of androgen alters the conformation of the AR ligand-binding domain fusion protein to promote its interaction with the AR N-terminal domain fusion protein. The binding of this activated complex of recombinant proteins, one of which contains the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, to one or more of the GAL4 binding sites of the luciferase reporter gene, activates expression of the firefly luciferase enzyme. The sensitivity of the assay for androgen-mediated receptor transactivation is further enhanced by the coexpression of the androgen receptor coactivator, ARIP3, which interacts with and stabilizes the AR N- and C-terminal protein interaction, thus amplifying the expression of the firefly luciferase enzyme. A constitutively active Renilla luciferase plasmid is used to control for transfection efficiency. Firefly and Renilla luciferase enzyme activities were measured with the Dual Luciferase kit (Promega, Madison, Wisc) according to the manufacturer's instructions, using a Turner 20/20 luminometer. The results are quantified based on the ratio of firefly:Renilla luciferase activities for known and test samples. The values from samples containing known concentrations of added testosterone (see above) were used to plot a standard curve of relative luciferase activity to testosterone concentration. Utilizing the standard curve, the biologically active androgen in each test sample was determined based upon its relative luciferase activity. Bioactive androgen concentrations were quantified in serum (30 µL) and intratesticular fluid (1 µL). The sensitivity of this assay is equivalent to 0.069 ± 0.03 nmol/L of testosterone; inter- and intra-assay CVs are 23% and 6%, respectively. All samples were assayed simultaneously and run in quadruplicate.
Semen Analysis![]()
Semen samples were obtained by masturbation into a sterile container after
a defined period of abstinence of 2 to 3 days. The ejaculate volume was
measured and the sperm concentration was determined using a Microcell counting
chamber (Conception Technologies Inc, La Jolla, Calif). The coefficient of
variation of this assay was 9% (Overstreet
et al, 1999). Proficiency testing was conducted quarterly by the
laboratory through the American Association of Bioanalysts. The average total
sperm count was calculated for each volunteer from 3 separate semen samples
obtained over a 1-week period.
Statistical Analysis![]()
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect differences among
groups. For comparisons between 2 group means, the Student's t test
was used. Means were considered to differ at P values less than .05.
Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the degree to which variables are
related.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The specificity of the assay was evaluated by measuring androgen bioactivity after adding various steroids to fetal calf serum stripped of endogenous steroids by absorption to dextran-coated charcoal. For this analysis, 0.5 nM testosterone, 6 nM testosterone, 0.5 nM dihydrotestosterone, 6 nM estradiol, 6 nM progesterone, or 6 nM testosterone plus the anti-androgen hydroxyflutamide (600 nM) were tested (Figure 1). An approximate 10-fold increase in androgen bioactivity was seen with the addition of 6 nM testosterone as compared to 0.5 nM testosterone, and androgen bioactivity was completely suppressed by the presence of hydroxyflutamide. DHT had approximately 10-fold higher bioactivity than testosterone, as would be expected (Raivio et al, 2002). Neither estradiol nor progesterone demonstrated androgenic activity. In addition, testosterone-free human serum (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, Tex) did not demonstrate detectable androgenic activity in this assay.
|
The mean total (immunoreactive) serum testosterone concentration for the 22 patients entered into this study, measured by RIA, was 11.7 ± 0.7 nM, and the androgen bioactivity in the serum of these same subjects, measured by the androgen bioactivity assay, was 8.1 ± 0.5 nM. This represented a significant (P < .01), 30% decrease from the total concentration (Figure 2). The total testosterone and bioactive androgen concentrations in intratesticular fluid were, in both cases, approximately 100-fold higher than the respective values in serum; the concentration of total (immunoreactive) testosterone was 1226 ± 86 nM, and that of bioactive androgen was 835 ± 74 nM (Figure 2). The 30% decrease in intratesticular bioactive androgen from immunoreactive intratesticular testosterone was significant (P < .01). As depicted in Figure 3, total testosterone and bioactive androgen concentrations in the serum of individual men were highly correlated (r = 0.624; P = .0019). In contrast, total testosterone and bioactive androgen concentrations in the intratesticular fluid did not correlate (r = 0.037; P = .87).
|
|
We wished to determine whether serum levels of total testosterone and/or bioactive androgen concentrations were predictive of intratesticular concentrations. Total testosterone concentration in the serum was not correlated with testosterone concentration in intratesticular fluid (P = .38), but it was weakly correlated with intratesticular bioactive androgens (r = 0.46; P = .03). The concentration of bioactive androgens in the serum was not correlated either with total testosterone (P = .64) or with bioactive androgen concentration (P = .35) in intratesticular fluid.
SHBG in the serum, and SHBG/ABP within the testes, are considered to be the major androgen-binding molecules in the human (Joseph, 1994). We hypothesized, therefore, that the difference between total testosterone and bioactive androgen levels in the serum and within the testes might result from the binding of androgens by SHBG/ABP. Surprisingly, the mean concentration of SHBG in testicular fluid was relatively low, 52.4 ± 9.7 nM. Moreover, although the difference between total testosterone concentration and bioactive androgen activity in the serum is relatively small compared to the difference between these parameters in intratesticular fluid, the concentration of SHBG in the serum, 46.1 ± 6.4 nM, was not significantly different from that in the testis.
The average sperm count of the men entered into this study was 156.4 ± 16.5 x 106 per mL, with a range of 36-294 x 106 per mL. Although each of the men was fertile, the range of sperm counts was broad. We wished to determine whether the intratesticular androgen concentration of these men was predictive of their sperm counts. No correlation was found between sperm count and intratesticular total testosterone concentration (P = .5) or bioactive androgen concentration (P = .25) in individual men.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We hypothesized that the difference between total testosterone and bioactive androgens within the testis would be accounted for by ABP/SHBG, the primary extracellular androgen-binding proteins within the testis. However, the concentration of SHBG/ABP within the testes, approximately 52 nM, was found to be far too low to account for the roughly 400-nM difference between total testosterone and bioactive androgen concentrations measured in human testicular fluid. Equally surprisingly, there was no difference between the concentration of SHBG in serum and SHBG/ABP within the testes. We have no explanation for the differences in total testosterone and bioactive androgen concentration in testicular fluid, except to suggest that testosterone might be made unavailable by binding to other, as yet unknown, molecules in addition to its binding to SHBG/ABP.
Studies of the rat have shown that intratesticular testosterone concentration can decline by over 50% without a significant effect on sperm count (Santulli et al, 1990). If the relationship between intratesticular testosterone concentration and sperm production in man is similar to that of the rat, a wide range of intratesticular testosterone concentrations in normal, fertile men would be anticipated. Therefore, one would hypothesize that intratesticular testosterone concentration would not predict sperm numbers. Indeed, we found this to be the case; no correlation was seen between sperm counts and either testosterone or bioactive androgen activity within the testis of the men entered into this study, all of whom were fertile. As intratesticular androgenic bioactivity falls below a threshold value, a direct relationship would be anticipated between sperm number and bioactive androgen concentration. This prediction is being tested at present.
There are subsets of subfertile men who might benefit from therapies designed to increase intratesticular testosterone concentration. Unfortunately, it is difficult to identify such men. For example, the results discussed above indicate that standard RIA of serum androgens would not reliably identify men whose intratesticular testosterone levels were low. This is also true in other circumstances. For example, in men who receive testosterone-based contraceptive regimens, peripheral testosterone concentrations are maintained at normal levels, while intratesticular testosterone concentrations are low, presumably because local production by Leydig cells is reduced following suppression of LH secretion (Jarow and Lipshultz, 1990). There is an obvious advantage in measuring testosterone within testicular fluids, particularly by the use of an assay that measures biologically active androgens. The disadvantage of such an approach is that the procedure is invasive. Nonetheless, knowledge of the quantitative relationship between intratesticular bioactive androgen concentration and sperm production might make it possible to assess the prognosis for effective androgen replacement therapy in at least some subfertile men.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chen H, Chandrashekar V, Zirkin BR. Can spermatogenesis be
maintained quantitatively in intact adult rats with exogenously administered
dihydrotestosterone? J Androl. 1994; 15: 132
-138.
Huhtaniemi I, Nikula H, Parvinen M, Rannikko S.
Pituitary-testicular function of prostatic cancer patients during treatment
with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analog. II. Endocrinology and
histology of the testis. J Androl. 1987; 8: 363
-373.
Jarow JP. Nonsurgical treatment of male infertility: empiric therapy. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, eds. Infertility in the Male. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby Co; 1997: 410 -423.
Jarow JP, Chen H, Rosner TW, Trentacoste S, Zirkint BR. Assessment of the androgen environment within the human testis: minimally invasive method to obtain intratesticular fluid. J Androl. 2001; 22: 640 -645.[Abstract]
Jarow JP, Lipshultz LI. Anabolic steroid-induced hypogonadotropic
hypogonadism. Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 429
-431.
Joseph DR. Structure, function, and regulation of androgen-binding protein/sex hormone-binding globulin. Vitam Horm. 1994; 49: 197 -280.[Medline]
Khan MS, Ewen E, Rosner W. Radioimmunoassay for human testosterone-estradiol-binding globulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;54: 705 -710.[Abstract]
McLachlan RI, O'Donnell L, Stanton PG, Balourdos G, Frydenberg M,
de Kretser DM, Robertson DM. Effects of testosterone plus medroxyprogesterone
acetate on semen quality, reproductive hormones, and germ cell populations in
normal young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87: 546
-556.
Morse HC, Horike N, Rowley MJ, Heller CG. Testosterone concentrations in testes of normal men: effects of testosterone propionate administration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1973; 37: 882 -886.[Medline]
Overstreet JW, Fuh VL, Gould J, et al. Chronic treatment with finasteride daily does not affect spermatogenesis or semen production in young men. J Urol. 1999; 162: 1295 -1300.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palermo GD, Cohen J, Rosenwaks Z. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a powerful tool to overcome fertilization failure. Fertil Steril. 1996;65: 899 -908.[Medline]
Raivio T, Palvimo JJ, Dunkel L, Wickman S, Janne OA. Novel assay
for determination of androgen bioactivity in human serum. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86: 1539
-1544.
Raivio T, Tapanainen JS, Kunelius P, Janne OA. Serum androgen
bioactivity during 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone treatment in elderly men.
J Androl. 2002;23: 919
-921.
Roberts KP, Zirkin BR. Androgen binding protein inhibition of androgen dependent transcription explains the high minimal testosterone concentration required to maintain spermatogenesis in the rat. Endocrine J. 1993; 1: 41 -47.
Santulli R, Sprando RL, Awoniyi CA, Ewing LL, Zirkin BR. To what extent can spermatogenesis be maintained in the hypophysectomized adult rat testis with exogenously administered testosterone? Endocrinology. 1990; 126: 95 -101.[Abstract]
Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, et al. Incidence and main causes
of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions
(1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 811
-816.
Turner TT, Jones CE, Howards SS, Ewing LL, Zegeye B, Gunsalus GL. On the androgen microenvironment of maturing spermatozoa. Endocrinology. 1984; 115: 1925 -1932.[Abstract]
Zirkin BR, Santulli R, Awoniyi CA, Ewing LL. Maintenance of advanced spermatogenic cells in the adult rat testis: quantitative relationship to testosterone concentration within the testis. Endocrinology. 1989; 124: 3043 -3049.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Bagchi, J. Wu, J. French, J. Kim, N. H. Moniri, and Y. Daaka Androgens Transduce the G{alpha}s-Mediated Activation of Protein Kinase A in Prostate Cells Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3225 - 3231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Boger-Megiddo, N. S. Weiss, M. J. Barnett, G. E. Goodman, and C. Chen V89L Polymorphism of the 5{alpha}-Reductase Type II Gene (SRD5A2), Endogenous Sex Hormones, and Prostate Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2008; 17(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |