| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the * Department of Urology, National Taiwan
University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University,
Taipei, Taiwan; and the
Department of Surgery,
Tien Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
| Correspondence to: Shih-Chieh Chueh, MD, PhD, Room 11-09, Clinical Research Building, No 7 Chung-Shan South Road, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan (e-mail: scchueh{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw) |
| Received for publication July 6, 2004; accepted for publication August 17, 2004. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Needlescope, laparoscope, varicocele, varicocelectomy, bipolar
Needlescopic instruments are defined as instruments with a diameter of no more than 3 mm so as to further reduce perioperative morbidity and enhance cosmesis (Schauer et al, 1999). Herein, we demonstrate a novel needlescopic technique for a varicocelectomy and examine its preliminary results for bilateral varicoceles.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We explained the procedure in detail and received written consent from each patient for laparoscopic varix ligation before the operation. The perioperative parameters of 25 patients with bilateral varicoceles operated on with our novel technique were compared with a historical cohort of another 25 patients with bilateral varicoceles operated on with the conventional laparoscopic approach. Although not every patient received morphine for postoperative pain control, the amount of postoperative narcotics used was converted to that (mg) of a morphine sulfate equivalent for the ease of comparison. The pain scores, ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), were the average of the scores in each patient during the first 16 postoperative hours as recorded by the attending nurses. Data in this study were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Comparisons between groups were made by means of Wilcoxon's rank sum tests or independent Student's t tests, for ordered discrete or continuous variables, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, Ill).
Surgical Technique![]()
Our novel minimally invasive approach of needlescopic bilateral varix
ligation was performed by applying only three 2-mm ports after the patient
received general endotracheal anesthesia and was put in a supine and modest
Trendelenburg position. Locations of the trocars and surgical procedures were
similar to those of the conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic technique,
but all 5- or 10-mm trocars originally used in the conventional technique were
replaced by 2-mm trocars in our novel approach. Two working trocar ports were
placed under optical guidance of a 2-mm needlescope at the lateral border of
each abdominal rectus muscle at a level lower than the umbilicus after an
immediate infraumbilical 2-mm port first created for pneumoperitoneum (up to
12-15 mm Hg of carbon dioxide) and for the needlescope
(Figure 1). Several 2-mm
laparoscopic instruments (including a mini-hook, minigrasper/dissector,
minisucker, miniscissors, and minibipolar electrocautery apparatus [US
Surgical Corporation, Tyco Healthcare, Norwalk, Conn]) were employed for this
procedure. After the overlying peritoneum was opened with a T-shaped incision,
segments of the internal spermatic veins on each side proximal to the internal
inguinal ring were dissected, isolated, and coagulated with a minibipolar
electrocautery apparatus for at least a 4-mm segment
(Figure 2A), and then each
coagulated vein was transected at the midpoint
(Figure 2B). The Ivanissevitch
procedure was attempted, and caution was exerted to preserve the accompanying
lymphatic channels and the testicular artery during dissection by recognizing
its pulsating and serpentine nature (Figure
2B). If necessary, xylocaine solution (2%) was irrigated on the
vessels through a 2-mm suction-irrigation device to improve vasodilatation,
arterial pulsation, and visual clarity during the dissection. The trick to
coagulate only the veins is to hold the vein away from the artery (or away
from the remaining part of the artery-vein complex if they are not well
dissected out yet) with a minigrasper in one hand and then to coagulate that
vein with a minibipolar apparatus in the other hand, as in
Figure 2A. Thus, whenever
coagulation is activated, there is always some space between the artery and
the coagulated part. After the bilateral procedures were completed, the
intraperitoneal pressure was reduced to 5 mm Hg to check for any subtle venous
oozing, and adequate hemostasis was obtained. Then the trocars were
subsequently removed with no suturing of any of the port wounds
(Figure 1B).
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The operative time (99.7 ± 9.6 minutes, range 54-153 minutes vs 127 ± 6.9 minutes, range 79-180 minutes; P = .06), the number of dilated internal spermatic veins ligated during the operation (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 2.5 ± 0.4), the percentages of patients with improved color Doppler images (88% vs 84%), and the percentages with completely resolved symptoms (84% vs 80%) were all similar in both groups. Of 12 patients in the needlescopic group and 14 in the conventional group with pre- and postoperative paired data of semen analysis, 7 (58%) and 8 (57%) patients, respectively, had improved sperm number, motility, or both. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, recurrence (persistence) of varicocele was noted in 2 patients (8%) of both the needlescopic and the conventional groups. There was no case of postoperative hydrocele in either group of patients.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The conventional technique of laparoscopic varix ligation is to ligate the vessels with clips and then transect them in between the clips (Donovan and Winfield, 1992; Matsuda et al, 1995; Pianalto et al, 2000). Sasagawa (2000) reported that they successfully transected the internal spermatic vessels purely using a harmonic scalpel, which comes only in diameters of 5 and 10 mm. Matsuda et al (1995) and Sanchez-de-Badajoz and Jimenez-Garrido (2002) ligated the dilated veins using an intracorporeal knot-tying technique that might require more technical labor, especially with 2-mm instruments. Although Copaescu et al (1996) and Amendolara et al (1999) described the technique of applying bipolar electrocoagulation to ligate dilated veins of the varicoceles, they all used 5-mm bipolar instruments. To our knowledge, this is the first series to describe the successful use of 2-mm bipolar electrocautery to control the internal spermatic vessels in a laparoscopic varicocelectomy. To perform the Ivanissevitch procedure, the veins were dissected and retracted away from the testicular artery during activation of the bipolar diathermy to prevent thermal injury to the artery.
For mild right varicocele, though, no well-controlled studies demonstrated the benefits of concomitant corrections, and the decision of whether to operate is still controversial. Bilateral varicoceles have been reported to be present in approximately 15%-57% of patients with clinical left varicocele (Scherr and Goldstein, 1999; Pianalto et al, 2000). Simultaneous bilateral varix ligation might offer better outcomes than just correcting the left varicocele (Amelar and Dubin, 1987; Scherr and Goldstein, 1999; Pianalto et al, 2000), but this necessitates another 3-4-cm inguinal incision with traditional open surgery, whereas the numbers and sizes of wounds for a laparoscopic varicocelectomy are the same for either unilateral or bilateral varicoceles. Our novel needlescopic technique of varicocelectomy offers an alternative approach with less discomfort than the conventional laparoscopic or traditional open bilateral varix ligation without sacrificing effectiveness.
The recurrence (or persistence) rates of the varicoceles in the 2 groups were relatively high, but this percentage still fell in the range of failure rates (5%-15%) reported by other laparoscopic series (Goldstein, 2002). And the efficacy of this new approach is and should be similar to that of its open counterpartthe traditional open retroperitoneal high-ligation (15%-25% failure; Goldstein, 2002) because they both ligate the veins at the same level. However, the recurrence could be a result of subsequent dilatation of the periarterial plexus of fine veins, which might not look dilated and were possibly recognized as lymphatics at the time of surgery because we intentionally preserved the artery. In our future cases, the fine veins around the artery should be more vigorously dissected to decrease the recurrence (persistence) rate. Other possible causes of recurrence could be the presence of dilated cremasteric veins or parallel inguinal collaterals that exit the testis, bypass the ligated retroperitoneal veins, and rejoin the internal spermatic vein proximal to the site of ligation. These collaterals are not visible from the laparoscopic view.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amelar RD, Dubin L. Right varicocelectomy in selected infertile patients who have failed to improve after previous left varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 1987; 47:833-837.[Medline]
Amendolara M, Antoniello L, Battocchio F. Laparoscopic treatment of varicocele. Chir Ital. 1999; 51:247-252.[Medline]
Copaescu C, Litescu M, Ghiga D. The laparoscopic treatment of varicocelea technical note. Chirurgia (Bucur). 1996; 45:125-127.
Donovan JF, Winfield HN. Laparoscopic varix ligation. J Urol. 1992; 147:77-81.[Medline]
Esposito C, Monguzzi GL, Gonzalez-Sabin MA, Rubino R, Montinaro L, Papparella A, Amici G. Laparoscopic treatment of pediatric varicocele: a multicenter study of the italian society of video surgery in infancy. J Urol. 2000; 163:1944-1946.[Medline]
Goldstein M. Surgical management of male infertility and other scrotal disorders. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002 :1571-1579.
Matsuda T, Ogura K, Uchida J, Fujita I, Terachi T, Yoshida O. Smaller ports result in shorter convalescence after laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol. 1995; 153:1175-1177.[Medline]
Pianalto B, Bonanni G, Martella S, Renier M, Ancona E. Results of laparoscopic bilateral varicocelectomy. Ann Ital Chir. 2000; 71:587-592.[Medline]
Sanchez de Badajoz E, Jimenez Garrido A. Microlaparoscopic varicocelectomy. Arch Esp Urol. 2002; 55:659-664.[Medline]
Sasagawa I, Yazawa H, Suzuki Y, Tateno T, Takahashi Y, Nakada T. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in adolescents using an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Arch Androl. 2000; 45:91-94.[Medline]
Schauer RP, Ikramuddin S, Luketich JD. Minilaparoscopy. Seminars Laparosc Surg. 1999; 6:21-31.
Scherr D, Goldstein M. Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral varicocelectomy in men with palpable bilateral varicoceles. J Urol. 1999; 162:85-88.[Medline]
World Health Organization. Comparison among different methods for the diagnosis of varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1985 ,43:575-582.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |