Journal of Andrology Cross-Journal Searching
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiborn, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bjartell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiborn, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bjartell, A.
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 25, No. 4, July/August 2004
Copyright © American Society of Andrology

Cystatin C Is Highly Expressed in the Human Male Reproductive System

THOMAS JIBORN*, MAGNUS ABRAHAMSON{dagger}, HANNA WALLIN{dagger}, JOHAN MALM{ddagger}, ÅKE LUNDWALL{ddagger}, VIRGIL GADALEANU§, PER-ANDERS ABRAHAMSSON* AND ANDERS BJARTELL*

From the* Department of Urology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden; the {dagger} Department of Clinical Chemistry, Lund University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden; and the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Divisions of {ddagger} Clinical Chemistry and § Pathology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.

Correspondence to: Dr Thomas Jiborn, Department of Urology, Malmö University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden (e-mail: thomas.jiborn{at}skane.se).
Received for publication December 5, 2003; accepted for publication January 23, 2004.

   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cystatin C displays the strongest inhibitory activity of all cystatins toward lysosomal cysteine proteases in general and has a widespread distribution in human tissues and body fluids, including seminal plasma. The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of cystatin C in the male reproductive system. Immunohistochemistry revealed a widespread distribution of cystatin C in normal tissues from the testis, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle, and prostate gland. Immunoreactive cystatin C was localized in basal and secretory epithelial cells, but also in neuroendocrine cells in the prostate, identified by immunostaining for chromogranin A. On adjacent tissue sections, we demonstrated local production of cystatin C utilizing nonradioactive in situ hybridization with a 201-base-long digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probe specific for the cystatin C transcript. Staining patterns obtained by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization correlated well. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitative analysis of cystatin C demonstrated that cystatin C was present at high concentrations in tissue homogenates from all locations investigated, compared to liver, muscle, spleen, and other general tissues. Western blotting of tissue homogenates revealed a predominant 15-kd cystatin C immunoreactive component in accordance with previous findings in other organs. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis to determine messenger RNA levels in whole tissue extracts showed that the cystatin C gene is highly expressed in the seminal vesicles and the prostate gland, indicating that the major amount of cystatin C in the male reproductive organs and seminal plasma is produced by cells in these 2 tissues. It is concluded that cystatin C is highly expressed and widely distributed throughout the male genital tract, suggesting that cystatin C is an important regulator for normal and pathological proteolysis in the male reproductive system.

     Key words: Cysteine protease inhibitor, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, quantitative real-time (QRT) PCR, seminal fluid



Cystatins are endogenous protease inhibitors with capacity to regulate the proteolytic activities of family C1 (papain-like) cysteine proteases such as human cathepsins B, H, K, L, and S (Abrahamson et al, 2003). The balance between family C1-cathepsins and their inhibitors (eg, cystatins) is of major importance in the regulation of the proteolytic activity under normal physiological conditions as well as in pathological degradation of proteins in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases (Barrett, 1987; Machleidt et al, 1992; Calkins and Sloane, 1995; Gacko et al, 1997).

The cystatin protein superfamily contains 3 major types of inhibitors. Cystatin A and B, of type 1, represent intracellular protease inhibitors, but low levels of these are also found in some body fluids (Järvinen, 1978; Abrahamson et al, 1986; Kartasova et al, 1987). Cystatin C, D, E/M, F, S, SA, and SN are type 2 cystatins, which probably have predominantly extracellular functions because they are synthesized with signal peptides for secretion (Abrahamson et al, 2003). Cystatin C displays the strongest inhibitory activity of all cystatins toward lysosomal cysteine proteases in general and has a widespread distribution in human tissues and body fluids (Abrahamson et al, 1986). Human type 3 cystatins comprise L- and H-kininogen, which together with cystatin C and {alpha}2-macroglobulin are the most important plasma inhibitors of cysteine proteases (Abrahamson et al, 1986).

Cystatin C inhibits family C1 cysteine proteases through tight and reversible binding in a substrate-competing mechanism resulting in an equimolar complex with the protease (Anastasi et al, 1983; Green et al, 1984; Nicklin and Barrett, 1984; Abrahamson et al, 1987a; Björk and Ylinenjarvi, 1990). The activity of cystatin C can be down-regulated in inflammatory conditions by the serine protease, neutrophil elastase (Buttle et al, 1990; Abrahamson et al, 1991). In intracellular compartments such as endosomes, regulation of cystatin C by cathepsin D might be important (Lenarcic et al, 1991).

The presence of the different cystatins in the male accessory sex glands is mainly still unknown, but cystatin A has been demonstrated in the basal epithelial cell layer in normal prostatic tissue and benign hyperplasia of the prostate (BPH; Söderström et al, 1995). Furthermore, the concentration of cystatin C in seminal plasma is higher than in any other body fluid (Abrahamson et al, 1986). Seminal plasma also contains cystatins S, A, and B in relatively high amounts, with a strikingly high total cystatin concentration of more than 5 µM as a result, strongly indicating an important need for efficient cysteine protease inhibition in the reproductive tract.

In order to further elucidate the role of cysteine proteases and their inhibitors, we now investigated the cellular localization, expression, and biochemical properties of cystatin C in tissue specimens from the male genital tract.


   Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissue Specimens

Tissue specimens from human testis (n = 3), epididymis (n = 3), vas deferens (n = 3), seminal vesicle (n = 3), and prostate (n = 5) obtained from urological operations were frozen on dry ice (for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and Western blotting) or in liquid nitrogen (for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction [QRT-PCR]) and stored at -80°C until analyzed. For immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), tissues were fixed within 30 minutes after removal in Bouin's solution (for 6 hours) or 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (overnight) and embedded in paraffin. For immunohistochemical studies, more than 6 tissue specimens from each location (testis, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle, and prostate) were analyzed. Tissues for ISH were obtained from patients undergoing transvesical prostatectomy for BPH (n = 2). All tissues used in the study were normal by histopathology according to hematoxylin-eosin staining. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee, Lund University (approval number LU 658-02), and the Helsinki Declaration regarding the use of human tissues was strictly followed.

Antibodies

A polyclonal rabbit antiserum called 8206 against human cystatin C purified from urine (Abrahamson et al, 1986) was used for IHC, ELISA, and Western blotting. For IHC we also used a commercially available polyclonal cystatin C antibody (code A0451; Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark). Monoclonal anti-human chromogranin A (CgA) immunoglobulins (IgGs, code M 869; DAKO) were used to identify neuroendocrine (NE) cells in prostatic tissues.

Biotinylated secondary antibodies, anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgGs, were included in DAKO ChemMate kit (code K5003; BioTek Solutions, Winooski, Vt). Rabbit anti-mouse IgG (code Z259, DAKO), alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) mouse monoclonal IgG (code D 0651; DAKO), and alkaline phosphatase–conjugated swine anti-rabbit IgGs (code D 0306; DAKO) were used in the APAAP method for IHC. Fab fragments of anti–digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase (AP) (code 1093274; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) were used for ISH.

Riboprobe Synthesis for in situ Hybridization

The following chemicals and reagents were purchased: T7 RNA polymerase (20 U/µL), RNase inhibitor from human placenta (40 U/µL), and DIG RNA labeling mix from Roche Applied Science (Roche Diagnostics Scandinavia AB, Bromma, Sweden); RNase-free DNase (1 U/µL) from Promega (Scandinavian Diagnostic Services, Falkenberg, Sweden); Advantage 2 PCR kit from Clontech (BD Bioscience, Stockholm, Sweden); RNA ladder, low range, from Fermentas (Tamro Medlab AB, Gothenburg, Sweden); and JetQuick from Genomed (Saveen, Malmö, Sweden).

Cystatin C minigenes were synthesized by PCR with the use of primers with appended T7 RNA polymerase promoters (Table 1) according to Logal et al (1992). The PCR reactions were performed with 1 µL of Advantage 2 polymerase mix in 50 µL of 0.2 mM dNTP containing buffer components provided with the Advantage 2 kit (40 mM Tricine-KOH pH 8.7, 15 mM KOAc, 3.5 mM MgCl2, 187.5 µg bovine serum albumin [BSA], and 0.005% each of Tween-20 and Nonidet-P40), 20 pmol each of PCR primers, and 10 ng of complementary DNA (cDNA) cloned in pUC18 (Abrahamson et al, 1987b). The PCR protocol consisted of an initial 1-minute denaturation at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 seconds at 95°C and 1 minute at 68°C. Finally, the reactions were incubated at 68°C for 1 minute and then chilled to 10°C. The PCR products were purified from primers and free deoxynucleotides by JetQuick and then analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel. Concentrations were estimated by comparing the staining intensity of PCR products and size standards after staining the gel with ethidium bromide.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for riboprobe synthesis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis
 

RNA probes of 201 bases in length were synthesized from 200 ng of minigene with 40 U of T7 RNA polymerase in 20 µL of 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 6 mM MgCl2; 10 mM dithiothreitol; 2 mM spermidine; 40 U of RNase inhibitor; 0.65 mM UTP; 0.35 mM DIG-11-UTP; and 1.0 mM each of ATP, GTP, and CTP. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 2 hours, after which 2 µL of DNase was added and the incubation was allowed to continue for another 15 minutes. The reactions were stopped with 2 µL of 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and the RNA was precipitated by addition of 2.5 µL of 4 M LiCl and 75 µL of prechilled ethanol. Following overnight storage at -20°C, the RNA precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 15 minutes. Following a wash in 70% ethanol, the material was briefly dried in vacuum and then dissolved in 100 µL H2O containing 40 U of RNase inhibitor. The RNA concentration was estimated from the staining intensity of RNA samples compared to that of components in the RNA ladder following electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide. RNA probes were stored at -70°C.

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections 3 µm in thickness were mounted on Superfrost plus slides (Menzel-Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany), and dried at 60°C for 20 minutes, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated in decreasing ethanol concentrations. Cystatin C immunoreactive cells were identified by the streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase (SA-HRP) conjugate method with diaminobenzidine as chromogen (Elias et al, 1989). For double immunostaining, sections were first processed with polyclonal anti-cystatin C IgGs and a DAKO ChemMate detection kit, and subsequently by the APAAP method with monoclonal IgGs and Fast Blue (Sigma Chemical Corp, St Louis, Mo) for detection of CgA. As a negative control, adjacent tissue sections were processed by replacing the primary antibody with nonimmune rabbit IgG diluted 1: 8000 (code X0936; DAKO). For specificity test, pure recombinant human cystatin C (Abrahamson et al, 1988) was added to the polyclonal antiserum at 100 times molar excess and incubated overnight before immunodetection.

Quantitation of Cystatin C by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

ELISA was performed for the determination of cystatin C according to the procedure described by Olafsson et al (1988), slightly modified to utilize a SA-HRP conjugate (code RPN.1231; Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) for detection of biotinylated monoclonal antibody HCC3 as a second detection antibody in the double-sandwich ELISA. For appropriate calibration curves, recombinant human cystatin C (Abrahamson et al, 1988) was used. Tissue samples were analyzed at the highest possible dilution to maximize dissociation of complexes between cystatin C and lysosomal proteases and other possible binders in the homogenates and to minimize risks of assay interference. To put the ELISA results for reproductive tissues in perspective, 2 series of tissue samples obtained at autopsy within 15 hours of death that had previously been used for cystatin C messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis (Abrahamson et al, 1990) were analyzed by the cystatin C ELISA. The concentration of cystatin C was related to total protein concentration in the homogenates, the latter measured by a dye-binding assay (Bradford, 1976).

Western Blotting

Tissue extracts containing 1–20 ng cystatin C according to ELISA were analyzed by immunoblotting under reducing conditions as previously described (Bjarnadottir et al, 1998). Briefly, proteins in tissue extracts from the male reproductive system were separated electrophoretically with 16.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels and electroblotted onto poly(vinilydene)difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, Mass). Subsequently, membranes were incubated with the same polyclonal anti-cystatin C IgG preparation as used for IHC, followed by a HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Dako A/S). The immunoreactive material was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence and the migration positions were compared with prestained size marker proteins (ECL Plus kit, Rainbow colored protein molecular weight markers; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Isolated recombinant cystatin C was included as a reference (Abrahamson et al, 1988).

In Situ Hybridization

All reagents were purchased from Sigma or Roche. Tissue specimens were fixed, paraffin-embedded, sectioned (4 µm), dried for 2 hours at 65°C, and mounted on SuperFrost plus slides (Menzel-Gläser) under RNase-free conditions.

The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated, after which they were first treated with 0.2 M HCl to abolish endogenous enzyme activity and then digested with proteinase K (20 µg/mL in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.5) for 25 minutes at 37°C. The slides were then incubated in 0.25% acetic anhydride containing 0.1 M triethanolamine and 0.15 M NaCl for 10 minutes and then equilibrated in 2x SSC (1x contains 150 mM NaCl and 15 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0). After pre-hybridization with 40 µL of hybridization buffer containing 50% (vol/vol) formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1x Denhardt's solution (BSA, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and Ficoll, all at 0.2 mg/mL), 4x SSC, and 0.4 mg/mL salmon sperm DNA at 85°C for 8 minutes and then at 42°C for 1 hour, the slides were hybridized with 40 µL of 250–500 ng/mL antisense or sense probe in hybridization buffer, first for 8 minutes at 85°C and then for 16 hours at 50°C.

After hybridization, the slides were washed in 1x SSC at room temperature (5 minutes twice), 0.1x SSC at 55°C (15 minutes 4 times), 1x SSC at room temperature (10 minutes) and then equilibrated in TBS (100 mM Tris-HCl, 0.4 M NaCl, pH 7.5). For detection of hybridization signals, tissue sections were first incubated in blocking reagent (0.5%, wt/vol, in TBS) for 1 hour at room temperature, rinsed in TBS, and subsequently incubated with anti-digoxigenin alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Roche) diluted 1:500 in TBS containing 0.5% (wt/vol) BSA for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing in TBS, the sections were equilibrated in detection buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl containing 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, pH 9.5) (5 minutes twice), and developed in detection buffer containing 1 mM levamisol, 0.33 mg/mL nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) and 0.167 mg/mL 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP). The color reaction was stopped after 20 minutes to 3 hours by incubating the sections in stop buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl containing 10 mM EDTA, 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.5) for 10 minutes. The slides were coverslipped with Faramount mounting medium (DAKO).

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

RNA was extracted from deep-frozen tissue samples after mincing, using the TRIzol reagent according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif). RNA quantities were determined spectrophotometrically. Complementary DNA was synthesized with TaqMan reverse transcription reagent (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif) with the use of 50 ng of RNA as template and random hexamers as primers in a total reaction volume of 100 µL. QRT-PCR was run with TaqMan Universal Mastermix (Applied Biosystems) in an ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) in a total reaction volume of 25 µL. Primers and TaqMan probes were designed with the aid of Primer Express 1.5 (Applied Biosystems) and were purchased from DNA Technology A/S (Aarhus, Denmark). Amplification of cystatin C was performed with a primer pair previously used for regular real-time PCR and was shown to give a specific product: primers MA097 and MA098 (Table 1), corresponding to a coding strand sequence in exon 1 (nt 245–264 in the cDNA sequence; GenBank/EMBL acc. X05607; Abrahamson et al, 1987b) and a noncoding strand sequence in exon 3 (nt 464–445) of the gene, respectively. The probe, MA576 (Table 1), corresponded to a noncoding strand sequence in exon 2 (nt 353–331 in the cDNA sequence). As endogenous controls, human GAPD (GAPDH) mRNA and 18S rRNA were amplified with commercially available primers/probes (GAPDH Endogenous Control and eukaryotic 18S rRNA Endogenous Control; Applied Biosystems). Five microliters of cDNA was used as template for the cystatin assay and 2 µL for the endogenous control assays. All QRT-PCR experiments were performed following the guidelines supplied by Applied Biosystems.

Complementary DNA from a pooled batch of the promyelocytic cell line U937, one of the best cystatin C producers identified to date in analyses of human cell lines (Ni et al, 1998), was used as assay calibrator, which was included on all assay plates to allow compensation for possible minor day-to-day variations of results. A 10-fold dilution series from 1 to 105 times dilution of the same cDNA was run in triplicate to generate standard curves. The input amounts of cDNA in samples were calculated from the threshold values (Ct) for the cystatin C and endogenous control assays. The standard curve also allowed calculations to compensate for interassay variations in amplification efficiency. The ratios of input cystatin C cDNA to the input amount of 18S and GAPDH cDNA were calculated. The normalized values were finally divided by the normalized values for the calibrator mRNA sample to obtain the relative levels of cystatin C mRNA in the samples.


   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Detection of Cystatin C Protein and mRNA in Tissue Sections

Immunoreactive cystatin C was found to be widely distributed in luminal epithelial cells as well as in basal cells throughout the male reproductive system (Figure 1A through F). In a vast majority of tissue specimens, we also found a few scattered cells in the stroma. Strong immunostaining for cystatin C was found in the epididymis, seminal vesicles, and prostate gland, whereas weak immunostaining was detected in the vas deferens. In tissue specimens from the testis, the Sertoli cells showed strong cystatin C immunoreactivity. Moderate staining intensity was found in Leydig cells, whereas the spermatogonia were negative. A weak immunoreactivity was detected in the rest of the germinal epithelium.



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical analysis for localization of cystatin C in paraffin sections of tissues from human male genital tract incubated with a polyclonal anti–cystatin C antibody. (A) Testis; arrows indicate (a) spermatogonia, (b) primary spermatocyte, (c) secondary spermatocyte, (d) spermatid, (e) Sertoli cell, and (f) Leydig cells. Most cells were cystatin C immunoreactive, except for spermatogonia cells. Immunostaining was also demonstrated in epithelial cells of the epididymis (B), vas deferens (C), seminal vesicle (D), and in benign prostatic tissue (E). Adjacent sections were devoid of immunostaining after incubation with nonimmune rabbit immunoglobulins (IgGs), as illustrated with a prostatic tissue section (F). High-magnification image shows stronger immunostaining for cystatin C in a neuroendocrine-like cell compared with the luminal and basal epithelial cells of the benign prostate (G). Double immunostaining for cystatin C (brown, streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase [SA-HRP] staining), and chromogranin A (CgA; blue, alkaline phosphatase anti–alkaline phosphatase [APAAP] staining) in a neuroendocrine cell in the benign prostatic epithelium (H). Immunostaining methods; APAAP in (A–F), SA-HRP in (G), and both in (H). Scale bar: (A–F): 20 µm; (G, H): 10 µm.

 

The immunostaining of the prostatic epithelium was homogenous, with the exception of a few, scattered cells with more intense immunostaining. The localization and features of these cells were similar to those of NE cells. As shown by double immunostaining with polyclonal antibodies against cystatin C and monoclonal antibodies against CgA, NE immunoreactivity was demonstrated in a subpopulation of the highly immunoreactive cystatin C–positive cells. In a minor population of the CgA–positive cells, we could not detect any coexpression of cystatin C (Figure 1G and H).

For ISH, the digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense probes were hybridized to adjacent tissue sections. In all the investigated tissues, hybridization signals were generated by the antisense probe, whereas the sense probe did not give rise to any positive signals (Figure 2A through D). The distribution pattern in the testis, epididymis, vas deferens, and seminal vesicles was in concordance with the immunohistochemical findings. However, in the prostatic epithelium, the basal cells showed a stronger signal than the secretory epithelial cells.



View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. In situ hybridization analysis for localization of cystatin C mRNA in tissues from human male genital tract. Paraffin sections from corpus epididymis (A), prostate gland (B), and seminal vesicle (C) were hybridized with a 201-base-long digoxigenin-labeled cystatin C antisense riboprobe construct and the corresponding sense probe (D). Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated Fab fragments of anti-digoxigenin immunoglobulins (IgGs) were used for detection with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium chloride as substrates. Scale bars = 20 µm.

 

Quantitation of Cystatin C in Tissue Homogenates

Cystatin C was detected by ELISA in all examined tissue extracts from the male reproductive system. Although we found a noticeable variation in the levels of cystatin C between samples taken from different individuals, the protein measurements reflected the immunohistochemical findings, with the highest concentrations found in the epididymis and the lowest in the vas deferens (Figure 3). The concentration of cystatin C in tissue homogenates of male reproductive organs is high compared with a panel of other human tissues (n = 2), with the mean values of 15, 0.35, 5.9, 1.2, and 8.5 ng cystatin C/mg protein for kidney, liver, muscle, spleen, and heart, respectively. Brain tissue was the only exception, containing 289 ± 69 ng cystatin C/mg protein.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Quantitation of cystatin C in male reproductive tissues. The bars show mean values from triple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measurements of cystatin C on tissue samples (all with an assay CV < 15%). The cystatin C concentrations were related to total protein concentrations in the samples. Individual results from male reproductive tissues of 3–5 donors are shown, indicating a large interindividual variation.

 

Western blotting demonstrated a single predominant band corresponding to a size of approximately 15 kd in tissue homogenates from all investigated locations (testis, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle, and prostate; Figure 4). Besides demonstrating that the antiserum used is monospecific, this result indicates that the molecular form of cystatin C present in the reproductive tissue is biochemically intact and likely fully active. Down-regulated cystatin C with poor inhibitory activity, as is found in inflammatory conditions, would have been detected as a ca 1.5-kd smaller band at immunoblotting (Buttle et al, 1990; Abrahamson et al, 1991).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunoblotting of cystatin C in tissue extracts derived from the male reproductive system. Tissue extracts containing 1–20 ng cystatin C according to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were analyzed and compared with 10 ng of recombinant cystatin C (r-Cystatin C). The same polyclonal anti-cystatin C immunoglobulin preparation as was used in immunohistochemistry identified an immunoreactive band with the same migration position as r-Cystatin C in all samples. Isolated r-Cystatin C was detected at a migration position corresponding to 15 kd in size and a smaller fraction at 30 kd, previously identified as a dimer. The sizes and migration of standard proteins are indicated to the left.

 

Quantitation of Cystatin C Gene Expression in Tissue Homogenates

To determine the relative amount of cystatin C mRNA in tissue homogenates, QRT-PCR was performed. Reverse transcriptase-generated cDNA from RNA of freshly frozen tissue was analyzed and compared to the content of mRNA for the housekeeping gene, GAPDH, and 18S rRNA. The expression pattern was that of a markedly higher expression in seminal vesicle and prostate than in the vas deferens, epididymis, and testis (Figure 5). The amounts found in seminal vesicles and prostate tissue were high, even when compared with RNA from homogeneous cultures of the promyelocytic cell line U937 (Figure 5).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Quantitation of cystatin C messenger RNA. RNA extracted from different human male reproductive tissues was analyzed. From each sample, complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized and then analyzed in triplicate by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) with cystatin C, 18S rRNA, and GAPDH specific probes. The bars show results based on ratios between cystatin C and 18S rRNA (the latter chosen rather than GAPDH as the endogenous control because it showed the least variation between tissues) and then presented as relative results, with the quantity in vas deferens RNA set to 1. The gray bars show mean values for RNA samples from the different tissues, with error bars indicating ±SD. RNA extracted from cultures of the human cell line U937 showing high production of cystatin C was analyzed in parallel for comparison (white bar).

 


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study show that cystatin C is widely distributed in the male reproductive system, which is in accordance with previous findings of high concentrations of cystatin C in seminal fluid (Grubb et al, 1983; Abrahamson et al, 1986). The immunohistochemical findings with a polyclonal antiserum against human cystatin C were in agreement with quantitation of tissue cystatin C by ELISA, with the use of a different monoclonal antibody for detection. Also, the presence of an immunoreactive band of ca 15 kd in Western blots supports the specificity of the polyclonal antiserum for cystatin C in tissue homogenates from all the investigated locations. We therefore believe that the localization results for cystatin C are firmly confirmed. Results from nonradioactive ISH studies demonstrated a staining pattern in accordance with the immunohistochemical findings. Thus, it appears that the major amount of intracellular cystatin C that was detected in certain cells of the tissues is locally produced. It cannot be ruled out, however, that some of the cystatin C detected originates from other cells in the tissues and is secreted and transported before it is taken up. In this context, it should be stressed that in cultured cells, 90%–95% of the newly synthesized cystatin C is routed for immediate secretion (Merz et al, 1997; Bjarnadottir et al, 1998; Nathanson et al, 2002). An indication that it might be relevant to consider the possibility that some of the cystatin produced is secreted and then taken up by other cells is found in the results from our quantitation of cystatin C mRNA in male reproductive tissues. Clearly, seminal vesicle and prostate show markedly higher gene expression than the other tissues, indicating that some of the protein in tissues containing much cystatin C by protein analysis, such as epididymis, perhaps originates from cells of other locations in the reproductive system. A high level of gene expression, production, and secretion of cystatin C in the seminal vesicle and the prostate gland agrees well with a strikingly high concentration of cystatin C in seminal plasma (Grubb et al, 1983; Abrahamson et al, 1986). Additionally, in prostatic tissues, ISH showed a stronger signal in the basal cells than in the rest of the epithelium. Immunohistochemistry, however, showed no difference in cystatin C immunoreactivity in these 2 cell types, suggesting that cystatin C produced in the basal cells is immediately secreted or transported to other cells.

The cystatins form a superfamily of structurally related proteins with different molecular properties and biological distribution. They are all potent, reversible, competitive inhibitors of cysteine proteases such as papain and many of the human cathepsins (Abrahamson et al, 2003). The cathepsins are mainly lysosomal proteases that can degrade extracellular matrix and basement membrane proteins (Lah et al, 1989; Werb 1989; Buck et al, 1992), and some of these enzymes are also thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and malignant diseases. The balance between these enzymes and their inhibitors (eg, cystatins) is thus most important for protection against endogenous proteolysis. Alterations in this balance are observed in different inflammatory diseases as well as in malignancy (Machleidt et al, 1992; Calkins and Sloane, 1995). Cystatin C is one of the main extracellular inhibitors of the papain-like cathepsins, and it is detected in many biological fluids, the highest concentrations being found in seminal plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and synovial fluid (Abrahamson et al, 1986).

The balance between cysteine proteases and their inhibitors could also be important for protection against exogenous proteases of microbial origin. Several studies suggest that cystatins might have important functions in the protection against infections by inactivating bacterial and viral cysteine proteases. Synthetic peptide derivates of cystatin C are shown to specifically block both in vitro and in vivo growth of group A streptococci (Björck et al, 1989). Additionally, the same peptides showed strong inhibitory effects on herpes simplex type 1 replication, as does cystatin C (Björck et al, 1990). Furthermore, it has previously been shown that macrophages secrete cystatin C (Chapman et al, 1990).

In this study, we found strong immunostaining for cystatin C in tissue specimens from the epididymis, seminal vesicle, and prostate. In the testis, Sertoli cells and Leydig cells showed strong and intermediate immunostaining, respectively. The spermatogonia were negative, whereas a weak immunoreactivity was detected in the rest of the germinal epithelium. In the majority of the tissue specimens, especially in the prostate, we found a few scattered cystatin C immunoreactive stromal cells. On the basis of their size and shape, they are most likely identified as macrophages, which is in concordance with previous studies showing that human macrophages express and release cystatin C (Chapman et al, 1990). ELISA showed high tissue levels of cystatin C in all investigated locations, the highest concentrations being found in the epididymis, indicating that cystatin C could have an important function in the protection of the spermatozoa from bacterial proteolytic activity.

Our findings support other data suggesting that cystatin C is one of the major protease inhibitors in the male reproductive system that might play an important role in the protection against infections, as well as being involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and malignant diseases.

An interesting finding in the present study was that cystatin C immunoreactivity in benign prostatic tissue showed 2 different patterns. In addition to the general cystatin C immunostaining that was seen throughout the prostatic epithelium, we found scattered, strongly cystatin C–positive intraepithelial cells with a distribution and appearance like NE cells. A subpopulation of these cells also expressed the NE cell marker CgA. NE cells containing neurosecretory granules rich in various peptide hormones and biogenic amines are dendritic intraepithelial regulatory cells in the human prostate gland. These cells are thought to be involved in the regulation of both prostatic growth and differentiation, as well as the homeostasis of exocrine secretory activity (Tutton and Barkla, 1987; Zachary et al, 1987; Bologna et al, 1989; Dalsgård, 1989; Seuwen and Pouyssegur, 1990; di Sant'Agnese, 1992). Previous studies have shown cystatin C immunoreactivity in human brain neurons and astrocytes, as well as in NE cells in the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, adrenal medulla, thyroid and pituitary (Löfberg et al, 1981; Grubb and Löfberg, 1985; Möller et al, 1985; Lignelid and Jacobsson, 1992; Lignelid et al, 1997). Interestingly, the nonendocrine epithelial cells of the pancreatic ducts and gastrointestinal mucosa showed weaker immunoreactivity for cystatin C than the adjacent NE cells, which resembles the staining pattern that we found in the secretory epithelium of the prostate. Lignelid et al (1997) have demonstrated the presence of cystatin C mRNA in human brain tissue and pituitary, indicating that cystatin C is produced in these locations. It has been suggested that cystatin C might be located in the secretory vesicles of the NE cells and that cystatin C could be involved in the intracellular regulation of the peptide hormones.

Cystatin C is widely expressed in the male reproductive system. Our data suggest that the presence of this potent protease inhibitor might be of significant importance in the regulation of normal physiological proteolysis, as well as in inflammatory diseases and malignancies in the male genital tract. Further studies are urgently needed to explore these suggestions, and the relevance of cystatin C in prostatic NE cells remains to be elucidated.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Arne Egesten (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden) for scientific advice and Ms Elise Nilsson, Mrs. Ulla Fält, Mrs. Christina Möller (Department and Laboratory of Pathology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University), and Mrs Anne-Cathrine Löfström (Department of Clinical Chemistry, Lund University Hospital) for their skillful technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
? Supported by grants from the Crafoord Foundation; the Swedish Science Council (grant 09915); the Swedish Cancer Society (projects 4294 and 4564); the Research Fund and the Cancer Research Fund of Malmö University Hospital; the Faculty of Medicine, Lund University; the Foundation for Urology Research in Malmö; and the Thulefjord Foundation. Back


   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abrahamson M, Alvarez-Fernandez M, Nathanson C-M. Cystatins. Biochem Soc Symp. 2003; 70: 179 -199.

Abrahamson M, Barrett AJ, Salvesen G, Grubb A. Isolation of six cysteine proteinase inhibitors from human urine. J Biol Chem. 1986;261: 11282 -11289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abrahamson M, Buttle DJ, Mason RW, Hansson H, Grubb A, Lilja H, Ohlsson K. Regulation of cystatin C activity by serine proteinases. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1991; 50: 4-6, 587–593.

Abrahamson M, Dalbøge H, Olafsson I, Carlsen S, Grubb A. Efficient production of native, biologically active human cystatin C by Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1988; 236: 14 -18.[Medline]

Abrahamson M, Grubb A, Olafsson I, Lundwall Å. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA coding for the precursor of the human cysteine proteinase inhibitor cystatin C. FEBS Lett. 1987b; 216: 229 -233.[Medline]

Abrahamson M, Olafsson I, Palsdottir A, Ulvsbäck M, Lundwall Å, Jensson O, Grubb A. Structure and expression of the human cystatin C gene. Biochem J. 1990; 268: 287 -294.[Medline]

Abrahamson M, Ritonja A, Brown MA, Grubb A, Machleidt W, Barrett AJ. Identification of the probable inhibitor reactive sites of the cysteine proteinase inhibitors human cystatin C and chicken cystatin. J Biol Chem. 1987a;262: 9688 -9694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Anastasi A, Brown MA, Kembhavi AA, Nicklin MJ, Sayers CA, Sunter DC, Barret AJ. Cystatin, a protein inhibitor of cysteine proteinases. Improved purification from egg white, characterization, and detection in chicken serum. Biochem J. 1983; 211: 129 -138.[Medline]

Barrett AJ. The cystatins: a new class of peptidase inhibitors. Trends Biochem Sci. 1987; 12: 193 -196.

Bjarnadottir M, Wulff BS, Sameni M, et al. Intracellular accumulation of the amyloidogenic L68Q variant of human cystatin C in NIH/3T3 cells. Mol Pathol. 1998; 51: 317 -326.[Abstract]

Björck L, Åkesson P, Bohus M, Trojnar J, Abrahamson M, Olafsson I, Grubb A. Bacterial growth blocked by a synthetic peptide based on the structure of a human proteinase inhibitor. Nature. 1989; 337: 385 -386.[Medline]

Björck L, Grubb A, Kjellen L. Cystatin C, a human proteinase inhibitor, blocks replication of Herpes simplex virus. J Virol. 1990;64: 941 -943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Björk I, Ylinenjarvi K. Interaction between chicken cystatin and the cysteine proteinases actinidin, chymopapain A, and ficin. Biochemistry. 1990; 29: 1770 -1776.[Medline]

Bologna M, Festuccia C, Muzi P, Biordi L, Ciomei M. Bombesin stimulates growth of human prostatic cancer cells in vitro. Cancer. 1989;63: 1714 -1720.[Medline]

Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248 -254.[Medline]

Buck MR, Karustis DG, Day NA, Hohn KV, Sloane BF. Degradation of extracellular-matrix proteins by human cathepsin B from normal and tumour tissues. Biochem J. 1992; 282: 273 -278.

Buttle DJ, Burnett D, Abrahamson M. Levels of neutrophil elastase and cathepsin B activities, and cystatins in human sputum: relationship to inflammation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990; 50: 509 -516.[Medline]

Calkins CC, Sloane BF. Mammalian cysteine protease inhibitors: biochemical properties and possible roles in tumor progression. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler. 1995; 376: 71 -80.[Medline]

Chapman HA Jr, Reilly JJ Jr, Yee R, Grubb A. Identification of cystatin C, a cysteine proteinase inhibitor, as a major secretory product of human alveolar macrophages in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141: 698 -705.[Medline]

Dalsgård CJ, Hultgårdh A, Hägerstrand A, Nilsson J. Neuropeptides as growth factors. Possible roles in human diseases. Regul Pept. 1989; 25: 1 -9.[Medline]

di Sant'Agnese PA. Neuroendocrine differentiation in carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer. 1992; 70: 254 -268.[Medline]

Elias JM, Margiotta M, Gaborc D. Sensitivity and detection efficiency of the peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP), avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC), and peroxidase-labeled avidin-biotin (LAB) methods. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989; 92: 62 -67.[Medline]

Gacko M, Bankowska A, Chyczewska E, Worowska A. Lysosomal cysteine proteinases and their significance in pathology. Rocz Akad Med. 1997;42(suppl 1): 60 -71.

Green GD, Kembhavi AA, Davies ME, Barrett AJ. Cystatin-like cysteine proteinase inhibitors from human liver. Biochem J. 1984;218: 939 -946.[Medline]

Grubb A, Löfberg H. Human {gamma}-trace structure, function and clinical use of concentration measurements. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1985;45(suppl 177): 7 -13.[Medline]

Grubb AO, Weiber H, Löfberg H. The {gamma}-trace concentration of human seminal plasma is thirty-six times that of normal human blood plasma. Scan J Clin Lab Invest. 1983; 43: 421 -425.[Medline]

Järvinen M. Purification and some characteristics of the human epidermal SH-protease inhibitor. J Invest Dermatol. 1978; 72: 114 -118.

Kartasova T, Cornelissen BJC, Belt P, van de Putte P. Effects of UV, 4NQO and TPA on gene expression in cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. Nucleic Acid Res. 1987; 15: 5945 -5962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lah TT, Buck MR, Honn KV, Crissman JD, Rao NC, Liotta LA, Sloane BF. Degradation of laminin by human tumor cathepsin B. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1989;7: 461 -468.[Medline]

Lenarcic B, Krasovec M, Ritonja A, Olafsson I, Turk V. Inactivation of human cystatin C and kininogen by human cathepsin D. FEBS Lett. 1991;280: 211 -215.[Medline]

Lignelid H, Collins VP, Jacobsson B. Cystatin C and transthyretin expression in normal and neoplastic tissues of the human brain and pituitary. Acta Neuropathol. 1997; 93: 494 -500.[Medline]

Lignelid H, Jacobsson B. Cystatin C in the human pancreas and gut: an immunohistochemical study of normal and neoplastic tissues. Virchows Arch A. 1992; 421: 491 -495.

Löfberg H, Grubb A, Brun A. Human brain cortical neurons contain {gamma}-trace. Rapid isolation, immunohistochemical and physiological characterization of human {gamma}-trace. Biomed Res. 1981; 2: 298 -306.

Logal J, Dill D, Leonard S. Synthesis of cRNA probes from PCR-generated DNA. Biotechniques. 1992; 13: 604 -660.[Medline]

Machleidt W, Assfalg-Machleidt I, Jochum M, Jänicke F, Schmitt M. Lysosomal cysteine proteinases as mediators of inflammation and tumor spread: control of their extracellular proteolytic activity. Fibrinolysis. 1992; 6(suppl 4): 125 -129.

Merz GS, Benedikz E, Schwenk V, Johansen TE, Vogel LK, Rushbrook JI, Wisniewski HM. Human cystatin C forms an inactive dimer during intracellular trafficking in transfected CHO cells. J Cell Physiol. 1997;173: 423 -432.[Medline]

Möller C, Löfberg H, Grubb A, Olsson S, Davies E, Barrett A. Distribution of cystatin C (gamma-trace), an inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteinases, in the anterior lobe of simian and human pituitary glands. Neuroendocrinology. 1985; 41: 400 -404.[Medline]

Nathanson C-M, Wassélius J, Wallin H, Abrahamson M. Regulated expression and intracellular localization of cystatin F in human U937 cells. Eur J Biochem. 2002; 269: 5502 -5511.[Medline]

Ni J, Alvarez Fernandez M, Danielsson L, et al. Cystatin F is a glycosylated human low molecular weight cysteine proteinase inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 24797 -24804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nicklin MJ, Barrett AJ. Inhibition of cysteine proteinases and dipeptidyl peptidase I by egg white cystatin. Biochem J. 1984;223: 245 -253.[Medline]

Olafsson I, Löfberg H, Abrahamson M, Grubb A. Production, characterization and use of monoclonal antibodies against the major extracellular human cysteine proteinase inhibitors cystatin C and kininogen. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1988; 48: 573 -582.[Medline]

Seuwen K, Pouyssegur J. Serotonin as a growth factor. Biochem Pharmacol. 1990; 39: 985 -990.[Medline]

Söderström K-O, Laato M, Wu P, Hopsu-Havu VK, Nurmi M, Rinne A. Expression of acid cysteine proteinase inhibitor (ACPI) in the normal human prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1995; 62: 1 -4.[Medline]

Tutton PJM, Barkla DH. Biogenic amines as regulators of the proliferative activity of normal and neoplastic intestinal epithelial cells [review.] Anticancer Res. 1987; 7: 1 -12.[Medline]

Werb Z. Proteinases and matrix degradation. In: Kelly WN, Harris ED Jr, Ruddy S, Sledge CB, eds. Textbook of Rheumatology. New York, NY: Saunders; 1989: 300 -321.

Zachary I, Woll PJ, Rozengurt E. A role for neuropeptides in the control of cell proliferation. Dev Biol. 1987; 124: 295 -308.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
T. Nakanishi, Y. Ozaki, K. Blomgren, H. Tateyama, M. Sugiura-Ogasawara, and K. Suzumori
Role of cathepsins and cystatins in patients with recurrent miscarriage
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 11(5): 351 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiborn, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bjartell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiborn, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bjartell, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS