| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the * Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology,
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and the
Departments of Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
Human Genetics and Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute, McGill
University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| Correspondence to: Dr Louis Hermo, McGill University, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, 3640 University St, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B2 (e-mail: louis.hermo{at}mcgill.ca). |
| Received for publication June 12, 2003; accepted for publication August 19, 2003. |
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Materials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Key words: Principal, narrow, clear, basal cells, lysosomes, orchidectomy, efferent duct ligation
ß-Hexosaminidase (Hex) is an example of a lysosomal enzyme showing
cell type and region specificity in its expression along the epididymis. In an
earlier study, quantification of mRNA expression of the 
and ß
subunits of Hex in the adult rat epididymis indicated that the ß subunit
is prominent in the epididymis, with highest expression in the corpus region
(Hermo et al, 1997). This
finding correlated with high levels of mRNA expression
(Stirling et al, 1991) and
enzyme activity (Conchie et al,
1959; Beccari et al,
1988) in the epididymis and higher specific activity in the corpus
region compared with other regions (Hall
and Killian, 1987; Hall et al,
1996). By light microscope (LM) immunocytochemistry, although Hex
was intensely expressed in narrow and clear cells, principal cells revealed
region-specific differences, with numerous lysosomes being intensely reactive
in the caput and proximal corpus, followed by the initial segment, distal
corpus, and cauda regions (Hermo et al,
1997). The prominent cell and region specificity of Hex suggested
an important role for this enzyme in the epididymis, as well as substrate
specificity with respect to substances internalized by principal cells
(Hermo et al, 1997).
Functionally, Hex catalyzes the hydrolysis of terminal ß-linked
N-acetylgalactosamine or N-acetylglucosamine residues from a
number of substrates, including GM2 ganglioside, as well as glycoproteins,
glycolipids, and glycosaminoglycans
(Gravel et al, 1995). There
are 2 major isoenzymes of Hex: Hex A, composed of an and a ß
subunit, and Hex B, a homodimer of ß subunits
(Mahuran et al, 1988;
Mahuran, 1990;
Gravel et al, 1995). To better
understand the role of Hex in the epididymis, mice were made deficient in Hex
A through targeted disruption of the Hexa gene (encodes the Hex
subunit) or in Hex A and B through disruption of the Hexb
gene (encodes the Hex ß subunit)
(Phaneuf et al, 1996). In the
Hexa-/- mice (Hex A-deficient), major abnormalities were restricted
to the initial segment and intermediate zone of the epididymis, whereas in
Hexb-/- mice, extensive abnormalities were found throughout the
entire epididymis (Adamali et al,
1999a and
b). The abnormalities were seen
as dramatic changes to the lysosomes of all epithelial cells, as a consequence
of their inability to degrade appropriate substrates internalized via
endocytosis. In Hexa-/- and Hexb-/- mice, significant quantities of 2 non-GM2
gangliosides, G2 and G3, accumulated in the epididymis
(Trasler et al, 1998). Such an
accumulation resulted in a dramatic increase in the appearance, size, number,
and distribution of lysosomes within the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells.
Taken together, these studies underline the importance of Hex in the lysosomes
of the epididymal epithelial cells.
In the context of regulation of epididymal lysosomal enzymes, various studies have revealed that expression of such enzymes can be under different regulatory factors. In fact, several lysosomal enzymes such as acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase, ß-glucuronidase, and arylsulfatase showed decreased enzymatic activity in the epididymis after orchidectomy (Mayorga and Bertini, 1982; Gupta and Setty, 1995; Abou-Haila et al, 1996). In comparison, prosaposin and cathepsin A, as revealed by immunocytochemistry, appeared to be unaffected in their expression in all epithelial cell types in the complete absence of testicular factors (Luedtke et al, 2000; Hermo and Andonian, 2003). On the other hand, regulation of cathepsin D revealed cell type and region-specific differences involving testicular factors (Hermo and Andonian, 2003). Thus, different regulatory factors appear to come into play for the different lysosomal enzymes and between the different epithelial cell types.
During postnatal development, the expression of different proteins often correlates with different events taking place at specific time points. For instance, by day 21, the lumen of many testicular seminiferous tubules is already formed, allowing the entry of Sertoli cell-secreted substances into the epididymal lumen (Tindall et al, 1975; Russell et al, 1989), and as such, these substances might regulate expression of several epididymal proteins (Hermo et al, 1994a). By day 39, androgen levels become high (Scheer and Robaire, 1980), at a time when principal cells become structurally differentiated and many proteins are expressed in an adultlike staining pattern (Sun and Flickinger, 1979; Hermo et al, 1992a; Hermo and Robaire, 2002). By day 49, sperm begin to appear in the caput epididymidis and by day 56 in the cauda region (Robaire and Hermo, 1988). Their entry into the epididymis has been suggested to be important for expression of various proteins (Garrett et al, 1991). Thus, from various postnatal studies, it has been demonstrated that different proteins are expressed at different time points and often in a cell type- and region-specific manner, leading to complex patterns of regulation during development (Hermo et al, 1994b and c; Hermo and Robaire, 2002).
In the rat epididymis, total Hex activity has been shown to increase more than 10-fold from infancy to sexual maturity and be dependent on androgens (Conchie et al, 1959). However, no information exists on the role of androgens on Hex expression in the specific cell types and different regions of the epididymis. Data on the cell type- and region-specific expression of Hex during postnatal development is also lacking. Considering the importance of Hex in the epididymis and its role in the degradation of endocytosed proteins, we undertook to examine the effects of testicular factors on the expression of Hex during postnatal development and in adult animals.
The purpose of this study was to examine the role of testicular factors, including androgens, on the expression of Hex in the different cell types and regions of the adult epididymis, employing efferent duct-ligated rats and orchidectomized rats supplemented or not with testosterone. Studies of rats at different postnatal ages were also performed to determine whether or not a correlation exists between the onset of Hex expression in the different epithelial cell types and regions of the epididymis and known events occurring in this tissue during postnatal development.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
All experimentation was carried out with minimal stress and discomfort being placed on the animals both during and after surgery, as set up by the guidelines and approval of the McGill University Animal Care Committee.
Tissue Preparation for Light Microscope Immunocytochemistry
At the end of each experiment, the epididymides of each rat were fixed by
perfusion with Bouin's fixative via the abdominal aorta for 10 minutes.
Following perfusion, the epididymides were removed and cut along their long
axis, so that given sections would include all of the major regions of the
epididymis (ie, the initial segment, intermediate zone, caput, corpus, and
cauda) (Hermo et al, 1991).
The tissue was then immersed in Bouin's fixative for 72 hours, after which it
was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin.
Postnatal Studies
For postnatal developmental studies, timed pregnant female Sprague-Dawley
rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratory Ltd. A number of litters, out
of which 36 male pups were chosen, were maintained on a 14 hour dark/10 hour
light photoperiod. They were provided with food and water ad libitum. After
birth, assessing body weight gain and palpating their testes and epididymides,
we monitored the normal development of the male pups. Only those pups showing
normal trends in development as reported by Hermo et al
(1992) were used, which
consisted of 6 rats at each of the following intervals: postnatal days 7, 21,
29, 39, 49, and 56. At each age, 2 rats were used to obtain the weights of the
paired testes and epididymides, and the other 4 were used to prepare the
tissue for light microscope immunocytochemical analysis. The body weights of
all animals used, as well as the testicular and epididymal weights of the 2
unfixed animals, were within the normal range obtained previously
(Hermo et al, 1992). The size
and appearance of the testes and epididymides of the 4 chemically fixed
animals were similar to those of the 2 unfixed animals.
The epididymides of all animals were fixed with Bouin fixative through the heart (days 7 and 21) or via retrograde perfusion of fixative through the abdominal aorta (all other ages) for 10 minutes. Following perfusion with either fixative, the epididymides were removed and cut so that given sections would include all of the major regions of the epididymis (ie, the initial segment, intermediate zone, caput, corpus, and cauda) (Hermo et al, 1991). The tissue was then immersed in Bouin fixative for an additional 72 hours, after which it was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin.
Light Microscope Immunostaining
Light microscope immunoperoxidase staining of the epididymides of all
animals was carried out with a rabbit polyclonal anti-Hex A antibody, raised
against human placental Hex A. Dr Don Mahuran provided the antibody to us;
details of the specificity and characterization of the antibody are described
in one of our earlier publications, where we examined Hex expression in the
epididymis of normal adult rats (Hermo et
al, 1997).
Sections 5 µm thick were cut and mounted on glass slides. They were then deparaffinized with xylene and hydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol (from 100% to 50%). During hydration, immersing the tissues in 70% ethanol containing 1% lithium carbonate for 5 minutes neutralized residual picric acid. In order to inactivate any endogenous peroxidase activity, the tissue sections were incubated for 5 minutes in 70% ethanol containing 1% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxide. Following hydration, the sections were incubated (5 minutes) in a 300-mM glycine solution in order to block free aldehyde groups. The tissue was then blocked with 40 mL of 10% goat serum and diluted in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin) at pH 7.4 for 25 minutes at room temperature. The slides were then washed with Tween buffer solution (TWBS, TBS with 0.1% Tween-20). A dilution factor of 1:100 in TBS was used for the affinity-purified polyclonal anti-ß-Hex A antibody. Tissue sections were incubated at 37°C in a moist chamber for 1 hour with 50 µL of the anti-Hex primary antibody.
After incubation, the sections were immersed in 4 consecutive wells of TWBS for 2 minutes each. The sections were then blocked with 40 mL of 10% goat serum for 15 minutes and subsequently incubated for 1 hour at 37°C in a humidified incubator with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to peroxidase (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, Mo) at a dilution of 1:250 in TBS. After incubation with a secondary antibody, the tissue was washed by immersion in 4 wells of TWBS for 2 minutes each.
The final reaction product was obtained by incubating the slides for 10 minutes in 250 mL of TBS containing 0.03% hydrogen peroxide, 0.1 M imidazole, and 0.05% diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, pH 7.4. The sections were washed in distilled water, counterstained with 0.1% methylene blue (2 minutes), and then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions (30 seconds each) and xylene (3 minutes). Cover slips were mounted onto glass slides using Permount.
Incubation of epididymal tissues with normal rabbit serum at a dilution of 1:100 in TBS and in secondary antibody alone, without primary antibody, served as negative controls. We have already published such images in our previous Hex article (Hermo et al, 1997).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
In the caput (Figure 2a through c, e, and f), intermediate zone (Figure 2d), and proximal corpus (not shown) epididymidis, the staining pattern of the different epithelial cells was noted to be similar to each other during postnatal development. At postnatal day 7, all the epithelial cells of these regions, undifferentiated at this age, were unreactive (Figure 2a). By day 21, narrow cells, found only in the initial segment and intermediate zone were reactive (not shown) and continued to be so at later ages (Figure 2d). Clear cells found in the caput and corpus regions also became intensely reactive by day 21 (Figure 2b) and continued to be so at all later ages (Figure 2e). In all epididymal regions, although some basal cells were intensely reactive by day 29, others were unreactive (Figure 2c), and this staining pattern persisted at all later ages (Figure 2d through f). Principal cells of the intermediate zone, caput, and proximal corpus epididymidis showed only an occasional reactive lysosome at day 21 (Figure 2b), and although several more became reactive by day 29 (Figure 2c and d), numerous reactive lysosomes were observed at days 39 (Figure 2e) and 49 (Figure 2f), comparable to that noted in normal adult animals (Hermo et al, 1997).
|
The distal corpus and proximal cauda regions also revealed comparable staining patterns for the different epithelial cells during postnatal development (Figure 3a through d). At postnatal day 7, the entire epithelium of either of these regions was unreactive (Figure 3a). At postnatal days 21 and 29, clear cells present in both of these regions were reactive (Figure 3b and c), and by day 39, numerous reactive clear cells were observed (Figure 3d). By day 29, basal cells revealed reactivity (Figure 3b), and at this age and all subsequent ages, both reactive and unreactive basal cells were noted in each of these epididymal regions (Figure 3d). Principal cells showed only an occasional reactive lysosome at days 21 (Figure 3c), and although several were noted at day 29 (Figure 3b), there was no apparent increase in the number of reactive lysosomes at any later age of development (Figure 3d).
|
Effects of Orchidectomy and Efferent Duct Ligation on Hex A
Expression in the Adult Epididymis
At the different time points after orchidectomy, narrow cells of the
initial segment (Figure 4a) and
intermediate zone and clear cells of the caput, corpus
(Figure 4c), and cauda regions
were intensely reactive and expressed Hex at levels comparable to the staining
pattern seen in control animals. These cells were also reactive in the
orchidectomized animals that received testosterone supplementation
(Figure 4b and d). Basal cells
of all epididymal regions did not change their staining pattern after
orchidectomy, with both reactive and unreactive basal cells being noted
(Figure 4a and c), and this was
true also for the orchidectomized animals that were supplemented with
testosterone (Figure 4b and d).
In contrast, principal cells of all epididymal regions showed an absence of
reactive lysosomes at all time points after orchidectomy
(Figure 4a and c). However,
administration of testosterone to orchidectomized rats restored staining to
the lysosomes of principal cells of all epididymal regions
(Figure 4b and d), such that
the number of reactive lysosomes of the different regions became comparable to
that noted for control animals. At the different time points after efferent
duct ligation, there was no change in the staining pattern of Hex A in narrow,
clear, basal, or principal cells (not shown). Taken together, the data suggest
that expression of Hex in principal cell lysosomes is dependent on systemic
androgens but that this is not the case for its expression in narrow, clear,
or basal cells.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In a previous study, Hex was localized by immunocytochemistry to principal cells of the normal adult epididymis, where a region-specific expression was noted, and to narrow, clear, and basal cells where no region-specific differences were observed (Hermo et al, 1997). In this study, we examined the regulation of Hex in the various epithelial cell types and regions of the epididymis in adult animals after orchidectomy and efferent duct ligation (Table 1). Adverse effects on expression of a variety of proteins and genes have been shown to occur in the absence of androgens, luminal factors, or both emanating from the testis (Robaire and Viger, 1995; Orgebin-Crist, 1996; Cornwall et al, 2002; Ezer and Robaire, 2002). In fact, several lysosomal enzymes such as acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, ß-glucuronidase, N-acetylhexosaminidase, and arylsulfatase show decreased enzymatic activity after orchidectomy, which is restored with testosterone supplementation (Mayorga and Bertini, 1982; Gupta and Setty, 1995; Abou-Haila et al, 1996). However, although a role for androgens in regulating epididymal functions has long been recognized (Orgebin-Crist et al, 1975; Robaire and Hermo, 1988), only recently has it been demonstrated that these functions are often regulated in a cell type- and even region-specific manner (Ezer and Robaire, 2002; Cornwall et al, 2002).
|
In the case of the epididymis, Hex activity has been reported to be androgen dependent (Conchie et al, 1959), and although adverse effects in expression were noted in this study, they were found to be cell specific. For the major epithelial cell type, principal cells, Hex expression was abolished after orchidectomy but restored with testosterone supplementation. Together with the finding that Hex expression was not altered in efferent duct-ligated animals, the data suggest that androgens regulate Hex expression in principal cells. This is of interest because efferent duct ligation has been shown to adversely affect the structural features of principal cells of the initial segment (Hoffer et al, 1973). However, it appears that this procedure has no effect on Hex expression. This is also the case for Yf-GST, osteopontin and several other proteins expressed by principal cells, which appear to be regulated by androgens (Hermo and Papp, 1996; Hermo and Robaire, 2002; Luedtke et al, 2002). In contrast, prosaposin, visualized by LM immunocytochemistry, was unaltered in its staining pattern in principal cells of the various epididymal regions in the absence of testicular factors (Hermo and Andonian, 2003). Likewise, in the efferent ducts, prosaposin expression in the nonciliated cells was unaffected by absence of testicular factors. However, in hypophysectomized animals, staining was abolished, suggesting that a pituitary factor directly or indirectly affects prosaposin expression in the efferent ducts (Rosenthal et al, 1995). In the case of cathepsin A, various experimental treatments failed to reveal any difference in its expression in lysosomes of the different cell types of the different epididymal regions (Luedtke et al, 2000). This was also shown to be the case for cathepsin D, which, although expressed in lysosomes of principal cells, was unaffected by absence of testicular factors (Hermo and Andonian, 2003). Thus, although androgens do not regulate expression of some proteins in principal cells, this does not appear to be the case for others (Cornwall and Hann, 1995; Cornwall et al, 2002; Ezer and Robaire, 2002).
In this study, narrow, clear, and basal cells remained as intensely reactive after the different treatments, as noted in control animals, with expression being evident throughout their cytoplasm (Table 1). Such a reaction pattern has been shown to be due to the abundance of lysosomes present in the large clear cells and in the smaller sized narrow and basal cells (Hermo et al, 1988, 1994a; Adamali and Hermo, 1996). Thus, although Hex expression in principal cells is regulated by androgens, this is not the case for narrow, clear, and basal cells, which do not appear to be regulated by testicular factors.
Clear cells, found only in the caput, corpus, and cauda epididymidis are highly active in endocytosis and degrade various substances from the lumen, including the breakdown products of cytoplasmic droplets (Hermo et al, 1988). Although no changes were noted in the expression of Hex in clear cells of this study (Table 1), as was also the case for prosaposin and cathepsin A expression by these cells (Luedtke et al, 2000; Hermo and Andonian, 2003), this was not the case for cathepsin D, which showed cell type- and region-specific differences. In lysosomes of principal cells, cathepsin D expression was unaffected by various treatments; however, clear cells, normally unreactive in all epididymal regions, became intensely reactive after orchidectomy, but only in the corpus and cauda regions. As expression, or a lack thereof, was restored to normal after testosterone administration and not modified in efferent duct-ligated animals, it was suggested that cathepsin D expression in clear cells of the corpus and cauda epididymidis is inhibited by testosterone in control untreated animals (Hermo and Andonian, 2003). Thus, in the epididymis, a great deal of variation based on individual cell types and region specificity is emerging in the regulation of the different lysosomal enzymes. Indeed, expression of different lysosomal enzymes appears to be under the control of stimulatory or inhibitory factors, which can be of similar or different identities.
Narrow cells are located in the initial segment and intermediate zone and are active endocytic cells, expressing a variety of proteins with diverse functions (Adamali and Hermo, 1996; Hermo and Robaire, 2002). Distinct from apical cells of these regions, the 2 differ structurally and functionally from each other (Adamali and Hermo, 1996). However, because of varying planes of section that occur through these 2 cell types, it is often difficult to differentiate one from the other without electron microscope analysis. In addition, because these 2 cell types both express Hex (Adamali and Hermo, 1996), we could not differentiate one from the other in this study. Hence, both narrow and apical cells, showing apically positioned nuclei, were grouped together and simply referred to as narrow cells. After orchidectomy or efferent duct ligation, no difference was noted in the staining pattern of these cells. Narrow cells express various other lysosomal enzymes, which like Hex in the present study (Table 1) are unaffected after orchidectomy (Luedtke et al, 2000; Hermo and Andonian, 2003). Although little is known about the regulation of narrow cell functions, other proteins expressed by these cells, such as Yb1-GST, appear to be regulated in the initial segment by testicular lumicrine factors (Andonian and Hermo, 2003).
In this study, no changes to Hex expression was noted for basal cells of any epididymal region (Table 1). In the context of other lysosomal enzymes, cathepsin A expression in basal cells was not regulated by testicular factors (Luedtke et al, 2000), as was also the case for cathepsin D and prosaposin (Hermo and Andonian, 2003). Basal cells express various isoforms of GSTs (Papp et al, 1995). In the corpus region, Yb1-GST expression in basal cells was regulated by testosterone, but in the proximal initial segment, a lumicrine testicular factor appears to regulate its expression (Andonian and Hermo, 2003). These data differ from the Yf-GST subunit, for which expression in basal cells was regulated by neither a testicular nor pituitary factor (Hermo and Papp, 1996). Expression of metallothionein by basal cells, although detectable in all epididymal regions, was shown to be androgen dependent according to specific regions (Cyr et al, 2001). Thus, even basal cells have complex regulatory mechanisms for expression of proteins of different functions.
Although androgens play a prominent role in regulating a variety of
epididymal functions, a role for estrogens has also been implicated in the
efferent ducts and epididymis, where estrogen receptors (ER) and
ß have been located (Meistrich et al,
1975; Fisher et al,
1997; Hess et al,
2002). Because sperm become absent after orchidectomy and efferent
duct ligation and aromatase activity is present in cytoplasmic droplets of
sperm, it would be unlikely that estrogen rather than testosterone regulates
Hex expression in principal cells. However, this could be eventually tested
with the estrogen knockout mouse model systems.
Postnatal Studies of Hex in the Epididymis
During postnatal development, total Hex activity in the rat epididymis has
been reported to increase 10-fold from infancy to sexual maturity
(Conchie et al, 1959); however,
no correlations of Hex expression in the different cell types and regions of
the epididymis have been performed during postnatal development. In the
present study, the onset of Hex expression varied according to cell type and
age of development (Table 2).
Although no cells expressed Hex by day 7, narrow and clear cells showed
reactivity by day 21, and although basal cells became reactive by day 29, it
was only by day 39 that principal cells of all regions presented their
adultlike staining pattern (Table
2). The adultlike pattern in principal cells by day 39 correlates
with high levels of androgens attained at this age of development
(Scheer and Robaire, 1980) and
when principal cells attain their adultlike structural features
(Hermo et al, 1992). Taken
together, this finding concurs with that obtained from orchidectomized adult
rats in this study, both of which reveal the dependence of testosterone or one
of its metabolites for Hex expression in principal cells.
|
The data of this study on postnatal development are also in agreement with the absence of a role for testosterone in Hex expression in narrow, clear, and basal cells (Table 2) because these cells express Hex at time points well before androgen levels reach their peak and when they become fully structurally differentiated (Hermo et al, 1992). Clearly, spermatozoa themselves or proteins derived thereof are not required for Hex expression in these cells because sperm only appear in the initial segment by day 39 (Robaire and Hermo, 1988; Papp et al, 1994), a time point well after the onset of Hex expression in narrow, clear, and basal cells, which occurs at day 21 and 29, respectively (Table 2).
The finding of Hex expression in narrow and clear cells by day 21 correlates with the entry of Sertoli-derived secreted products, which appear in the epididymis beginning at about postnatal day 15, when the seminiferous tubular lumen is formed (Tindall et al, 1975; Russell et al, 1989), and 1 or several of these could be factors regulating Hex expression in these cells. However, onset of expression in basal cells is only by day 29. Because both basal and narrow cells exist in the initial segment, where the Sertoli cell-secreted products would first appear, the data on Hex expression suggest that different factors are involved in regulation of Hex expression in these 2 different cell types.
In the case of other proteins that have been examined in the epididymis during postnatal development, complex patterns of expression have emerged. In all of these cases, onset of expression varied not only according to cell type, but region specificity as well as the time point when onset began and when adultlike staining patterns of expression first appeared (Papp et al, 1994; Hermo et al, 1994a and b, 1999; Badran and Hermo, 2002). Because testicular factors do not play a role in regulating Hex expression in narrow, clear, and basal cells in adult animals, growth factors, hormones, or other stimulatory factors derived from other tissues/organs could be responsible for Hex expression in adult animals and during postnatal development. Clearly more work is required to determine what specific factor or factors regulate Hex expression in narrow, clear, and basal cells of the epididymis.
In this study, expression of Hex was dependent on androgens in principal cells of the entire epididymis, but this was not the case for expression in narrow, clear, and basal cells. The importance of Hex in lysosomes of principal cells has been noted in our earlier studies employing knockout mouse models, in which these cells, with time, become engorged with lysosomes. It is, therefore, suggested that absence of androgen input on the epididymis, as created by anti-androgen contraception, could have deleterious long-term effects on principal cell structure and functions that could eventually affect the integrity of the blood epididymal barrier.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Adamali HI, Hermo L. Apical and narrow cells are distinct cell
types differing in their structure, distribution and functions in the adult
rat epididymis. J Androl. 1996; 17:208-222.
Adamali HI, Somani IH, Huang J-Q, Mahuran D, Gravel RA, Trasler JM,
Hermo L. I. Abnormalities in cells of the testis, efferent ducts and
epididymis in juvenile and adult mice with beta-hexosaminidase A and B
deficiency. J Androl. 1999a; 20:779-802.
Adamali HI, Somani IH, Huang J-Q, Mahuran D, Gravel RA, Trasler JM,
Hermo L. II. Characterization and development of the regional- and
cellular-specific abnormalities in the epididymis of mice with
beta-hexosaminidase A deficiency. J Androl. 1999b; 20:803-824.
Andonian S, Hermo L. Immunolocalization of the Yb1 subunit of
glutathione S-transferase in the adult rat epididymis following orchidectomy
and efferent duct ligation. J Androl. 2003; 24:577-587.
Badran HH, Hermo LS. Expression and regulation of aquaporins 1, 8,
and 9 in the testis, efferent ducts, and epididymis of adult rats and during
postnatal development. J Androl. 2002; 23:358-373.
Beccari T, Orlacchio A, Stirling JL. Identification of ß-N-acetlyhexosaminidase A in mouse tissues with the fluorigenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-ß-N-acetylglucosamine 6-sulfate. Biochem J. 1988; 252:617-620.[Medline]
Brawer JR, Schipper H, Robaire B. Effects of long term androgen and estradiol exposure on the hypothalamus. Endocrinology. 1983; 112:194-199.[Medline]
Conchie J, Findlay J, Levvy GA. Mammalian glycosidases: distribution in the body. Biochem J. 1959; 71:318-325.
Cornwall GA, Hann SR. Specialized gene expression in the
epididymis. J Androl. 1995; 16:379-383.
Cornwall GA, Lareyre J-J, Matusik RJ, Hinton BT, Orgebin-Crist M-C. Gene expression and epididymal function. In: Robaire B, Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002:169-199.
Cyr DG, Dufresne J, Pillet S, Alfieri TJ, Hermo L. Expression and regulation of metallothioneins in the rat epididymis. J Androl. 2001;22:124-135.[Abstract]
Ezer N, Robaire B. Androgenic regulation of the structure and functions of the epididymis. In: Robaire B, Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002:297-316.
Fisher JS, Millar MR, Majdic G, Saunders PT, Fraser HM, Sharpe RM.
Immunolocalisation of oestrogen receptor-alpha within the testis and excurrent
ducts of the rat and marmoset monkey from perinatal life to adulthood.
J Endocrinol. 1997; 153:485-495.
Garrett SH, Garrett JE, Douglass J. In situ histochemical analysis of region-specific gene expression in the adult rat epididymis. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991;30:1-17.[Medline]
Gravel RA, Clarke JTR, Kaback MM, Mahuran D, Sandhoff K, Suzuki K. The GM2 gangliosidoses. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995:2839-2879.
Gupta G, Setty BS. Activities and androgenic regulation of lysosomal enzymes in the epididymis of rhesus monkey. Endocr Res. 1995;21:733-741.[Medline]
Hall JC, Killian GJ. Changes in rat sperm membrane glycosidase activities and carbohydrate and protein contents associated with epididymal transit. Biol Reprod. 1987; 36:709-718.[Abstract]
Hall JC, Perez FM, Kochins JG, Pettersen CA, Li Y, Tubbs CE, LaMarche MD. Quantification and localization of N-acetyl-ß-D-hexosaminidase in the adult rat testis and epididymis. Biol Reprod. 1996; 54:914-929.[Abstract]
Hamilton DW. Structure and function of the epithelium lining the ductuli efferentes, ductus epididymis and ductus deferens in the rat. In: Greep RO, Astwood EB, eds. Handbook of Physiology. Section 7, Vol 5. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society; 1975:303-317.
Hermo L, Adamali HI, Mahuran D, Gravel RA, Trasler JM.
ß-Hexosaminidase immunolocalization and - and ß-subunit gene
expression in the rat testis and epididymis. Mol Reprod
Dev. 1997;46:227-242.[Medline]
Hermo L, Andonian S. Regulation of sulfated glycoprotein-1 (SGP-1)
and cathepsin D expression in the adult rat epididymis. J
Androl. 2003;24:408-422.
Hermo L, Barin K, Robaire B. Structural differentiation of the epithelial cells of the testicular excurrent duct system of rats during postnatal development. Anat Rec. 1992; 233:205-228.[Medline]
Hermo L, Dworkin J, Oko R. Role of epithelial clear cells of the rat epididymis in the disposal of the contents of cytoplasmic droplets detached from spermatozoa. Am J Anat. 1988; 183:107-124.[Medline]
Hermo L, Lustig M, Lefrancois S, Argraves WS, Morales CR. Expression and regulation of LRP-2/megalin in epithelial cells lining the efferent ducts and epididymis during postnatal development . 1999; 53:282-293.
Hermo L, Oko R, Morales CR. Secretion and endocytosis in the male reproductive tract: a role in sperm maturation. Int Rev Cytol. 1994a;154:105-189.
Hermo L, Papp S. Effects of ligation, orchidectomy, and hypophysectomy on expression of the Yf subunit of GST-P in principal and basal cells of the adult rat epididymis and on basal cell shape and overall arrangement. Anat Rec. 1996; 244:59-69.[Medline]
Hermo L, Papp S, Robaire B. Developmental expression of the Yf subunit of glutathione S-transferase P in epithelial cells of the testis, efferent ducts, and epididymis of the rat. 1994b; 239:421-440.
Hermo L, Robaire B. Epididymal cell types and their function. In: Robaire B, Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002 : 81-102.
Hermo L, Wright J, Oko R, Morales CR. Role of epithelial cells of the male excurrent duct system of the rat in the endocytosis or secretion of sulfated glycoprotein-2 (clusterin). Biol Reprod. 1991; 44:1113-1131.[Abstract]
Hess RA, Zhou Q, Nie R. The role of estrogens in the endocrine and paracrine regulation of the efferent ductules, epididymis and vas deferens. In: Robaire B, Hinton BT, eds. The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002 : 317-337.
Hoffer AP, Hamilton DW, Fawcett DW. The ultrastructure of principal cells and intraepithelial leucocytes in the initial segment of the rat epididymis. Anat Rec. 1973; 175:169-202.[Medline]
Igdoura SA, Morales CR, Hermo L. Differential expression of cathepsins B and D in testis and epididymis of adult rats. J Histochem Cytochem. 1995;43:545-557.[Abstract]
Luedtke CC, Andonian S, Igdoura S, Hermo L. Cathepsin A is
expressed in a cell- and region-specific manner in the testis and epididymis
and is not regulated by testicular or pituitary factors. J
Histochem Cytochem. 2000;48:1131-1146.
Luedtke CC, McKee MD, Cyr DG, Gregory M, Kaartinen MT, Mui J, Hermo
L. Osteopontin expression and regulation in the testis, efferent ducts, and
epididymis of rats during postnatal development through to adulthood.
Biol Reprod. 2002; 66:1437-1448.
Mahuran DJ. Characterization of human placental beta-hexosaminidase
I2: proteolytic processing intermediates of hexosaminidase A.
J Biol Chem. 1990; 265:6794-6799.
Mahuran DJ, Neote K, Klavins MH, Leung A, Gravel RA. Proteolytic
processing of human pro-ß-hexosaminidase: identification of the internal
site of hydrolysis that produces the nonidentical ßa and
ßb polypeptides in the mature ß-subunit. J
Biol Chem. 1988;263:4612-4618.
Mayorga LS, Bertini F. Effect of androgens on the activity of acid hydrolases in rat epididymis. Int J Androl. 1982; 5:345-352.[Medline]
Meistrich ML, Hughes TH, Bruce WR. Alteration of epididymal sperm transport and maturation in mice by oestrogen and testosterone. Nature. 1975;258:145-147.[Medline]
Moore HD, Bedford JM. The differential absorptive activity of epithelial cells of the rat epididymis before and after castration. Anat Rec. 1979; 193:313-327.[Medline]
Orgebin-Crist M-C. Androgens and epididymal function. In: Bhasin S, Gabelnick H, Spieler G, Swerdloff R, Wand C, eds. Pharmacology, Biology, and Clinical Application of Androgens. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc; 1996: 27-38.
Orgebin-Crist M-C, Danzo BJ, Davies J. Endocrine control of the development and maintenance of sperm fertilizing ability in the epididymis. In: Greep RO, Astwood EB, eds. Handbook of Physiology. Section 7, Vol 5. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society; 1975:319-338.
Papp S, Robaire B, Hermo L. Immunocytochemical localization of the Ya, Yc, Yb1, and Yb2 subunits of glutathione S-transferases in the testis and epididymis of adult rats. Microsc Res Tech. 1995; 30:1-23.[Medline]
Phaneuf D, Wakamatsu N, Huang J-Q, et al. Dramatically different
phenotypes in mouse models of human Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases.
Hum Mol Genet. 1996; 5:1-14.
Robaire B, Hermo L. Efferent ducts, epididymis, and vas deferens: structure, functions, and their regulation. In: Knobil E, Neill J, eds. The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1988 : 999-1080.
Robaire B, Viger RS. Regulation of epididymal epithelial cell functions. Biol Reprod. 1995; 52:226-336.[Abstract]
Rosenthal AL, Igdoura SA, Morales CR, Hermo L. Hormonal regulation of sulfated glycoprotein-1 synthesis by nonciliated cells of the efferent ducts of adult rats. Mol Reprod Develop. 1995; 40:69-83.[Medline]
Russell LD, Bartke A, Goh JC. Postnatal development of the Sertoli cell barrier, tubular lumen, and cytoskeleton of Sertoli and myoid cells in the rat, and their relationship to tubular fluid secretion and flow. Am J Anat. 1989; 184:179-189.[Medline]
Scheer H, Robaire B. Steroid 
4-5-reductase
and 3-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the rat epididymis during
development. Endocrinology. 1980; 107:948-953.[Abstract]
Stirling JL, Beccari T, Hoade J, Pezzetti F, Calvitti M, Becchetti E, Orlacchio A. Analysis of the patterns of expression of mRNAs for the alpha- and beta-subunits of the lysosomal enzyme beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase in mouse epididymis and testis. Histochem J. 1991; 23:490-494.[Medline]
Stratton ID, Ewing LL, Desjardins C. Efficacy of testosterone-filled polydimethylsiloxane implants in maintaining plasma testosterone in rabbits. J Reprod Fertil. 1973; 35:235-244.
Suarez-Quian CA, Jelesoff N, Byers SW. Lysosomal integral membrane proteins exhibit region and cell type specific distribution in the epididymis of the adult rat. Anat Rec. 1992; 232:85-96.[Medline]
Sun EL, Flickinger CJ. Development of cell types and regional differences in the postnatal rat development. Am J Anat. 1979;154:27-55.[Medline]
Tindall DJ, Vitale R, Means AR. Androgen binding protein as a biochemical marker of formation of the blood-testis barrier. Endocrinology. 1975; 97:636-648.[Abstract]
Tomomasa H, Waguri S, Umeda T, Koiso K, Kominami E, Uchiyama Y. Lysosomal cysteine proteinases in rat epididymis. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994;42:417-425.[Abstract]
Trasler J, Saberi F, Somani IH, et al. Characterization of the
testis and epididymis in mouse models of human Tay Sachs and Sandhoff diseases
and partial determination of accumulated gangliosides.
Endocrinology. 1998; 139:3280-3288.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. Bedford Editorial Commentary J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 82 - 83. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
