| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

From the * Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist
Hospital, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University; and
Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei,
Taiwan, Republic of China.
| Correspondence to: Dr Geng-Long Hsu, Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, 424 Pa Te Road, Section 2, Taipei, Taiwan 10558, Republic of China. |
| Received for publication May 23, 2002; accepted for publication August 9, 2002. |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Penile curvature, impotence, topical block, venous grafting, epinephrine
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Anesthesia of the Penis![]()
A 23-gauge x 1.5-inch disposable needle was used to inject the local
anesthetic of a 0.8% 50-mL lidocaine solution prepared in an aseptic steel
bowl that was prefilled with 0.1 mL of a 1:200 000 epinephrine solution
(Hsu, 1999). The needle, with
its bevel parallel to the direction of the body axis, was inserted in between
the suspensory ligament along the public angle with two fingers holding the
penile shaft (Figure 2A) away
from the body axis. The solution was injected in three directions to cover the
bilateral proximal dorsal nerves (Figure
2B). Peripenile infiltration was subsequently made with
finger-guided manipulation. Ventral infiltration
(Figure 2C) was performed,
including a meticulous injection to the junction between the corpus spongiosum
and the corpora cavernosa. The injection had to be sufficiently encircled in
order to cover the entire penile shaft
(Figure 2D). Aspiration was
performed immediately before any attempt at injection, so that an inadvertent
entering of a vessel was avoided.
|
Operation of the Deep Dorsal Vein![]()
A circumferential incision was made and then a degloving procedure was
performed to expose the deep dorsal vein that was readily seen by a milking
manipulation 0.5 cm proximal to the retrocoronal sulcus. The venous trunk
served as a guide for the thorough stripping, and it was kept moist throughout
the entire procedure. Any tributary had to be double ligated with two ties in
order to apply a scissors to cut them apart. The vein was moved until the
level of the infrapublic angle was met. The removed vein was immersed in
saline solution for at least 30 minutes, then it was sutured side by side with
a 6-0 nylon suture (Figure 3B) after it was detubularized (Figure
3A).
|
Operation of the Venous Patch![]()
The penile shape was assessed by creating an artificial erection using
saline infusion via a #19 or #21 scalp needle. The neurovascular bundle was
freed with hydropressure dissection in which the normal saline solution was
injected into the most curvilinear area in between the tunica albuginea and
its overlying tissue in order to expand and separate them, and it was tagged
with a Penrose drain. After dorsal or ventral exposure of the tunica, the
inelasticity of the plaque was evident. An incision was made transversely on
the Peyronie plaque, and the corporotomy defect was patched with the venous
graft, which was placed with the serosal side outward, spliced together if
necessary, and continuously fashioned with a 6-0 nylon suture. Enhanced
sutures were made 1-cm intervals apart. The artificial erection was repeated
to ensure that the penis was straight. If curvature persisted, further
modifications by way of incisions and grafting combined with a contralateral
modified Nesbit procedure were undertaken whenever necessary. The overlying
fascia layers and skin were closed layer by layer with 5-0 chromic
sutures.
A postanesthesia questionnaire was administered, and the answers were recorded. Subsequently, each patient was followed-up to determine his satisfaction with the penile morphology as evaluated using the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scoring for erectile capability.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One venous patch was required in 13 patients, and the remaining 16 men needed two pieces. In 11 patients, a small ellipse of a modified Nesbit procedure was made on the contralateral tunica to obtain a more satisfactory shape. Among them, the excised tunica was patched to the contralateral side in five patients. Among patients who underwent venous patch with or without the Nesbit procedure, or venous patch with tunical graft, there was no preference of treatment.
The lidocaine dosage was from 280 to 400 mg with an average of 352.2 ± 57.7 mg. This quantity was sufficient to cover the average operation time (205.5 ± 31.3 minutes), however, 11 of 29 (38%) patients required a booster injection. The side effects included puncture of vessels in four (13.7%) patients, transient palpitation in two (6.9%) patients, and subcutaneous ecchymosis in six (20.7%) patients. One patient contracted an infection that manifested as a preputial ulceration, and was cured after treatment for 1 month with no microorganism isolated.
Overall, the postoperative penile shape was satisfactory in 27 (93.1%) patients whose postoperative penile deviation was less than 10°, but mild penile deviation of less than 15° was reported in 2 (6.9%) patients without further surgery. Erectile function has been good in 26 patients for whom the mean preoperative IIEF-5 score of 20.9 ± 3.2 was increased to a mean postoperative IIEF-5 score of 22.7 ± 1.5. Unfortunately, a satisfactory erection could not be attained until 10 months after the operation in two patients. One patient subsequently received a penile implant. Three patients had undergone an unsuccessful first surgery somewhere else and experienced an uneventful course, even though their tissues were fibrotic.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessing the precise position and length of the tunical incision largely depends on the principle of trial and error with repeated artificial erections. The decision of the surgeon is paramount in avoiding inadequate as well as over-correction. Precise correction is preferable through a modified Nesbit procedure. This explains why 11 of 29 patients required tunica plication procedures, albeit a small ellipse, to accomplish satisfactory straightening. The suture material is an important consideration in this operation. We used fine 6-0 nylon, which is sufficiently tenacious and biocompatible, rather than an absorbable kind.
Finger-guided manipulation using the index finger of the assistant's hand is helpful to confirm the precise position of the injection throughout the anesthetic procedure, as the tissue is palpable because of the paucity of adipose tissue and the nature of the layered penile tissue. This in turn enables the technique to be easily endured. The bevel of the injection needle is preferably parallel to the long axis of the body avoiding the possibility of needle severance of a nerve. A peripenile injection is recommended to puncture the needle in the 12 and 6 o'clock positions to avoid unnecessary pain if puncture more.
We generally use lidocaine as a local anesthetic as advocated for retention in the corpora cavernosa (Light and Scott, 1985); however, we caution against needle puncture of the sinusoid through the tunica, particularly if an implant is in situ and a booster injection is necessary when the patient registers some intraoperative pain. Likewise, this avoids the possible complications of headache, dizziness, palpitations, nausea, and vomiting that result from epinephrine because the corporeal drainage is always substantial. Whereas application of marcaine, which is more durable than lidocaine might be advocated, its potential toxicity has prevented us from experimenting with its use.
It is generally agreed that adrenaline is contraindicated for use as a local anesthetic (Auletta and Grekin, 1985; Scott, 1989; Berens and Pontus, 1990), however, there is a paucity of possible ischemia in our series. Under careful manipulation, this drug is good for prolonging the anesthesia time up to 5 hours (Bernards and Kopacz, 1999). We believe that postoperative ischemia of the human penis should be ascribed to iatrogenic damage, not to the drug.
Painful injections may be expected, but in reality a slow injection as well a quick puncture through the skin is acceptable (Serour et al, 1998). Creating a wheal as a result of a subcutaneous injection should be avoided, otherwise intolerable injection pain might scare the patient.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacon AK. An alternative block for post circumcision analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care.1977; 5:63 -64.[Medline]
Berens R, Pontus SP Jr. A complication associated with dorsal nerve block. Reg Anaesth.1990; 15:309 -310.
Bernards CM, Kopacz DJ. Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans. Anesthesiology.1999; 91:962 -968.[Medline]
Brannigan RE, Kim ED, Oyasu R, McVary KT. Comparison of tunica albuginea substitutes for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. J Urol. 1998;159:1064 -1068.[Medline]
Brown TC, Weidner NJ, Bouwmeester J. Dorsal nerve of penis blockanatomical and radiological studies. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1989;17:34 -38.[Medline]
Bruschini H, Mitre AI. Peyronie disease: surgical treatment with muscular aponeurosis. Urology.1979; 13:505 -507.[Medline]
Collins JP. Experience with lyophilized human dura for treatment of Peyronie disease. Urology.1988; 31:379 -381.[Medline]
Dad S, Amar AD. Peyronie's disease: excision of the plaque and grafting with tunica vaginalis. Urol Clin North Am.1982; 9:197 -201.[Medline]
Devine CJ Jr, Horton CE. Surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease with a dermal graft. J Urol.1974; 111:44 -49.[Medline]
Dos Reis JM, Glina S, Da Silva MF, Furlan V. Penile prosthesis surgery with the patient under local regional anesthesia. J Urol. 1993;150:1179 -1181.[Medline]
Fournier GR Jr, Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Peyronie's plaque: surgical treatment with the carbon dioxide laser and a deep dorsal vein patch graft. J Urol. 1993;149:1321 -1325.[Medline]
Ganabathi K, Dmochowski R, Zimmern PE, Leach GE. Peyronie's disease: surgical treatment based on penile rigidity. J Urol. 1995;153:662 -666.[Medline]
Gelbard MK, Hayden B. Expanding contractures of the tunica albuginea due to Peyronie's disease with temporalis fascia free grafts. J Urol. 1991;145;:772 -776.[Medline]
Gholami SS, Lue TF. Peyronie's disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28:377 -390.[Medline]
Hsu GL. Peyronie's disease. In: Kim YC, Tan HM, eds. APSIR BOOK on Erectile Dysfunction. Kuala Lampur, Malaysia: Pacific Cosmos Sdn Bhd; 1999;200 -212.
Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM, Devine CJ. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's Urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1998 : 3376-3386.
Kim ED, McVary KT. Long-term followup of treatment of Peyronie's disease with plaque incision, carbon dioxide laser plaque ablation and placement of a deep dorsal vein patch graft. J Urol.1995; 153:1843 -1846.[Medline]
Krishnamurti S. Penile dermal flap for defect reconstruction in Peyronie's disease. Operative technique and four years experience in 17 patients. Int J Impot Res.1995; 7:195 -208.[Medline]
Leach GE. Local anesthesia for urologic procedures. Urology. 1996;48:284 -288.[Medline]
Levine LA, Lenting EL. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. J Urol.1997; 158:2149 -2152.[Medline]
Light JK, Scott FB. Implantation of the inflatable penile prosthesis using local anesthesia. In: Kaye KW, ed. Outpatient Urologic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger,1985 : 261-268.
Lowe DH, Ho PC, Parsons CL, Schmidt JD. Surgical treatment of Peyronie disease with dacron graft. Urology.1982; 19:609 -610.[Medline]
Lowsley OS, Gentile A. An operation for the cure of certain cases of plastic induration (Peyronie's disease) of the penis. J Urol. 1947;57:552 -554.
Lue TF, El-Sakka AI. Venous patch graft for Peyronie's disease. Part 1: technique. J Urol.1998; 160:2047 -2049.[Medline]
Montorsi F, Salonia A, Maga T, et al. Evidence based assessment of long-term results of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie's disease. J Urol. 2000;163:1704 -1708.[Medline]
Moriel EZ, Grinwald A, Rajfer J. Vein grafting of tunical incisions combined with contralateral plication in the treatment of penile curvature. Urology. 1994;43:697 -701.[Medline]
Nagao K, Ishii N, Miura K, Shirai M. One-day penile prosthesis surgery by penile block. Int J Urol.2000; 7:S56 -60.
Rowan RL, Howley TF. Local penile anesthesia. J Urol. 1967;97:1056 .[Medline]
Scott DB, ed. Techniques of Regional Anesthesia. Norwalk, Conn: Medi-Globe;1989 .
Serour F, Mandelberg A, Mori J. Slow injection of local anesthetic will decrease pain during dorsal penile block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:926 -928.[Medline]
Stav A, Gur L, Gorelik U, Ovadia L, Isaakovich B, Sternberg A. Modification of the penile block. World J Urol.1995; 13:251 -253.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Hsieh, H.-S. Chen, P.-Y. Ling, H.-S. Wen, L.-J. Liu, C.-W. Chen, and C. Chua The Advancement of Pure Local Anesthesia for Penile Surgeries: Can an Outpatient Basis Be Sustainable? J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 200 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, H.-S. Chen, C.-H. Hsieh, R. M. Chen, H.-S. Wen, L.-J. Liu, and C. Chua Long-Term Results of Autologous Venous Grafts for Penile Morphological Reconstruction J Androl, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, H.-S. Chen, C.-H. Hsieh, P.-L. Ling, H.-S. Wen, L.-J. Liu, C.-W. Chen, and M.-W. Liu Insufficient Response to Venous Stripping Surgery: Is the Penile Vein Recurrent or Residual? J Androl, September 1, 2006; 27(5): 700 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Hsieh, H.-S. Wen, W.-L. Hsu, Y.-C. Chen, R. M. Chen, S.-C. Chen, and J.-T. Hsieh The Effect of Electrocoagulation on the Sinusoids in the Human Penis J Androl, November 1, 2004; 25(6): 954 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Hsieh, H.-S. Wen, W.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Wu, T.-H. Fong, S.-C. Chen, and G.-F. Tseng Anatomy of the Human Penis: The Relationship of the Architecture Between Skeletal and Smooth Muscles J Androl, May 1, 2004; 25(3): 426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-L. Hsu, C.-H. Hsieh, H.-S. Wen, Y.-C. Chen, S.-C. Chen, and M. S. Mok Penile Venous Anatomy: An Additional Description and Its Clinical Implication J Androl, November 1, 2003; 24(6): 921 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Mulhall Editorial Commentary: Outpatient surgery for penile venous patch with the patient under local anesthesia J Androl, January 1, 2003; 24(1): 40 - 40. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |