Journal of Andrology, Vol. 27, No. 1, January/February 2006
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05010
Semen Parameters in Norwegian Fertile Men
TRINE B. HAUGEN*,
,
THORE EGELAND
AND
ØYSTEIN MAGNUS
From * Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo University
College;
Andrology Laboratory, Rikshospitalet
University Hospital;
Department of Medical
Genetics, Ullevaal University Hospital; and
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
|
Correspondence to: Trine B. Haugen, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo
University College, PO Box 4 St Olavs Plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway (e-mail:
trine.b.haugen{at}hf.hio.no). |
The World Health Organization (WHO) provides guidelines for assessing the
various semen variables. A set of reference ranges is given in the WHO
Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus
Interaction, but several studies indicate that the values should be revised.
Furthermore, semen parameters obtained at different laboratories are not
directly comparable even if the same methods are used. Thus, it is recommended
that each laboratory establish its own reference ranges. In this study, semen
from 99 men who had recently achieved a pregnancy were analyzed to establish
reference ranges for semen variables. The reference values were based on the
group with time to pregnancy (TTP) 12 cycles or less (92%) and abstinence time
from 2 to 7 days. The 5th and 10th percentiles for sperm concentration were
10.6 and 16.9 x 106/mL, respectively, and 33% (5th
percentile) and 43% (10th percentile) for spermatozoa with progressive
motility. These values were below the WHO lower limit. The percentages of
ideal spermatozoa (percentage with normal morphology according to WHO strict
criteria) were 3 (5th percentile) and 4 (10th percentile). Thirty-nine percent
reported that their partners became pregnant during the first cycle after they
had stopped using contraception. The semen parameters in this group were
compared with the others. Overall, the semen parameters were more favorable in
the group with TTP = 1 cycle than in the group with TTP > 1. Sperm
concentration, progressive motility, and percentage of ideal spermatozoa
according to WHO strict criteria were significantly different in the 2 groups.
However, when analyzed by multiple logistic regression, only "total
numbers of sperm with progressive motility" remained in the model (P =
.002). This is in accordance with previous studies indicating that a
combination of semen characteristics provides a better predictor of male
fertility potential than the single parameters. In conclusion, new reference
ranges for semen variables deviating from the WHO values are established for
our laboratory.
Key words: Semen variables, reference range, World Health Organization, partners to pregnant women
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E M Lewis
Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility?
Reproduction,
July 1, 2007;
134(1):
31 - 40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society of Andrology.