Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 26, No. 6, November/December 2005
Copyright © American Society of Andrology
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05044

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Yosef, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Yosef, D.

Severe Hypospermatogenesis in Cases of Nonobstructive Azoospermia: Should We Use Fresh or Frozen Testicular Spermatozoa?

RON HAUSER*, LEAH YOGEV*, AMI AMIT{dagger}, HAIM YAVETZ*, AMNON BOTCHAN*, FUAD AZEM*, JOSEPH B. LESSING* AND DALIT BEN-YOSEF{dagger}

From the * Institute for the Study of Fertility and the {dagger} IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Correspondence to: Dr Ron Hauser, Institute for the Study of Fertility, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel (e-mail: ronh{at}tasmc.health.gov.il).


The aim of this comparative clinical study was to examine whether the fertilizing potential of frozen-thawed testicular sperm in the most severe cases of hypospermatogenesis is reduced compared with fresh testicular sperm. The results could determine the necessity of using fresh testicular sperm cells, which mandates involving the spouse by performing simultaneous in vitro fertilization intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment in this subgroup of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. We studied 13 couples in which the husband was diagnosed as having NOA and few motile testicular sperm cells or only immotile testicular sperm cells were isolated by testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Each couple underwent both an ICSI cycle, in which fresh testicular sperm that were retrieved shortly beforehand were injected, and a consecutive cycle, which used frozen-thawed sperm that were retrieved in the original TESE procedure but were cryopreserved and stored until use. We found that motility was lost during the freezing and thawing process in some cases, which resulted in significantly more cycles with only immotile sperm cells for injection in the frozen-thawed sperm group (38.5%) than in the fresh sperm group (7.7%; P < .05). Availability of only immotile sperm cells significantly reduced fertilization rates in both fresh and frozen-thawed groups, but the respective overall fertilization rate (44.9% vs 41.1%) and quality of embryos and pregnancy rate (18.2% vs 15.4%) were not significantly different between groups. Implantation rates were more favorable in the fresh sperm group (10.5% vs 5.9%), but not significantly so. We conclude that, although cryopreservation does impair motility, which results in significantly more cycles with only immotile sperm cells for ICSI in the most severe forms of hypospermatogenesis, fertilization and pregnancy rates are not significantly compromised.

     Key words: Testicular sperm extraction, fertilization, implantation, IVF-ICSI






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society of Andrology.