This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boe-Hansen, G. B. Articles by Christensen, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boe-Hansen, G. B. Articles by Christensen, P.

Variability and Laboratory Factors Affecting the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay in Human Semen

ANNETTE K. ERSBøLL

From the ^* Department of Large Animal Sciences, Section for Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics and the Section for Population Biology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Correspondence to: Gry Brandt Boe-Hansen, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Large Animal Sciences, Section for Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Dyrlaegevej 68, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark (e-mail: gbh{at}kvl.dk).

During the past decade, the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) has become an important tool for assessing semen quality in the human andrology laboratory. The SCSA uses the metachromatic properties of the fluorescent dye acridine orange (AO) in combination with flow cytometry to determine the sperm DNA susceptibility to denaturation in situ. The objective of this study was to evaluate laboratory factors affecting the SCSA and the variation between replicates. Semen ejaculates from 3 healthy volunteers were analyzed using the SCSA protocol as described by Evenson and Jost (2000), determining the X-mean, Y-mean, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), standard deviation of DFI (SD-DFI), and high DNA stainability (HDS). In experiment 1, the effects of thawing time, time of day, day, laboratory technician, donor, and incubation period before analysis were investigated. In experiment 2, the effects of sheath fluid, AO equilibration buffer, day, laboratory technician, donor, and incubation period before analysis were investigated. A significant difference was found between the 3 donors with respect to the X-mean, Y-mean, DFI, SD-DFI, and HDS. It was shown that incubation of the semen samples on ice postthaw had a significant effect on the X-mean, Y-mean, DFI, and SD-DFI. The laboratory technician conducting the analysis accounted for up to 15.4% for the variation of the SCSA measurements. The time of day affected the variation for the Y-mean (23.5% of the total variation of the Y-mean), and the day affected the variation for the X-mean (82.8% of the total variation of the X-mean). Incubation on ice for 5 to 25 minutes postthaw had a significant effect on the DFI and SD-DFI in both experiments. This study shows that several protocol steps in the SCSA affect the results obtained from the assay. Precise protocol description and standardization of the SCSA are therefore essential to achieve high agreement within and between different laboratories.

     Key words: Flow cytometry, DNA integrity, spermatozoa, acridine orange

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. B. Boe-Hansen, J. Fedder, A. K. Ersboll, and P. Christensen The sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1576 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Makhlouf and C. Niederberger DNA Integrity Tests in Clinical Practice: It Is Not a Simple Matter of Black and White (or Red and Green) J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 316 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Evenson Reply to: 'The predictive value of the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)'--a response from the SCSA inventor. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 570 - 572. [Full Text] [PDF]