Journal of Andrology Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulhall, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mulhall, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, A.
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 26, No. 2, March/April 2005
Copyright © American Society of Andrology

The Utility of Optical Loupe Magnification for Testis Sperm Extraction in Men With Nonobstructive Azoospermia

JOHN P. MULHALL, SAMEH W. GHALY, NADID AVIV AND ABSAAR AHMED

From the Departments of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center and Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

Correspondence to: Dr John P. Mulhall, Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 E 68th St, Starr 900, New York, NY 10021.


The testis of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) harbors sperm in approximately 30% to 60% of cases. Use of an operating microscope has been shown to result in better sperm retrieval rates. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate the ability of a modified microsurgical approach using magnifying loupes (3.5x) to improve the rates of sperm retrieval during testis sperm extraction (TESE). The study group consisted of patients with NOA who underwent TESE. Before December 1998, TESE was conducted in a standard fashion, and from 1999 on, loupe magnification was used. Comparison was made between the 2 groups with regard to sperm retrieval rates, need for bilateral TESE, and number of tunical incisions. Overall sperm retrieval rates did not differ between the 2 groups (45% vs 50%). However, in patients with testicular volumes of 10 mL or less, patients who underwent standard TESE had a retrieval rate of 27% compared with 42% when using the optical loupe magnification (P = .025). The use of loupe magnification may permit surgeons without access to or experience using an operating microscope to obtain better rates of sperm retrieval in men with NOA who have testicular volumes of 10 mL or less.

     Key words: Male infertility, intracytoplasmic sperm injection




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey
Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society of Andrology.