Journal of Andrology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrell, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrell, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, L.

Journal of Andrology, Vol 22, Issue 4 604-610, Copyright © 2001 by The American Society of Andrology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Altered protamine 2 expression is uncommon in donors of known fertility, but common among men with poor fertilizing capacity, and may reflect other abnormalities of spermiogenesis

D. T. Carrell and L. Liu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA. dcarrell@med.utah.edu

During the spermatid elongation stage of spermiogenesis approximately 85% of sperm nuclear histones are replaced by protamines. Protamines increase the packing ratio of sperm chromatin, presumably facilitating sperm motility and function. In this study we evaluated the incidence of abnormal protamine expression in 75 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and 50 donors of known fertility by isolation of sperm nuclear proteins, quantitative gel electrophoresis, and Western blot analysis. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between abnormal protamine expression and semen quality, sperm penetration ability, chromatin stability, and IVF outcome. Seventeen percent (13/75) of IVF patients had no measurable protamine 2 (P2) versus 0% (0/50) of donors of known fertility (P < .005). Sperm penetration rates were decreased in 12 of 13 patients without P2, and mean penetration rates (4.6 +/- 1.2 vs 32.8 +/- 2.9, P < .005), normal morphology (22.4 +/- 3.6 vs 48.7 +/- 4.2, P < .05), and progressive motility (22.3 +/- 2.5 vs 35.4 +/- 2.1, P < .05) were all significantly decreased compared with patients with measurable P2. The mean sperm concentration was not significantly different. The presence of protamine precursor bands was also associated with a diminished penetration capacity (18.4 +/- 2.8 vs 36.7 +/- 3.0, P < .05). Sperm chromatin decondensation following exposure to heparin sulfate was significantly increased in patients without a measurable P2 band. Twelve patients with no measurable P2 underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with 6 patients (6/12, 50%) becoming pregnant. ICSI fertilization and subsequent embryo cleavage were not different in patients without P2 compared with other patients undergoing ICSI. These data indicate that abnormal sperm protamine levels are a common defect in infertility patients, but not in donors of known fertility. It appears that abnormal protamine levels may reflect defects of late spermiogenesis, including sperm penetration capacity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. T. Carrell, B. R. Emery, and S. Hammoud
Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link?
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 313 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Singleton, A. Zalensky, G.F. Doncel, M. Morshedi, and I.A. Zalenskaya
Testis/sperm-specific histone 2B in the sperm of donors and subfertile patients: variability and relation to chromatin packaging
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 743 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
V. W. Aoki, B. R. Emery, L. Liu, and D. T. Carrell
Protamine Levels Vary Between Individual Sperm Cells of Infertile Human Males and Correlate With Viability and DNA Integrity
J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 890 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. V. Zubkova and B. Robaire
Effects of ageing on spermatozoal chromatin and its sensitivity to in vivo and in vitro oxidative challenge in the Brown Norway rat
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2901 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. Zini and J. Libman
Sperm DNA damage: clinical significance in the era of assisted reproduction.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 29, 2006; 175(5): 495 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Z. He, W.-Y. Chan, and M. Dym
Microarray technology offers a novel tool for the diagnosis and identification of therapeutic targets for male infertility
Reproduction, July 1, 2006; 132(1): 11 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Oliva
Protamines and male infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 417 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
X. Zhang, M. S. Gabriel, and A. Zini
Sperm Nuclear Histone to Protamine Ratio in Fertile and Infertile Men: Evidence of Heterogeneous Subpopulations of Spermatozoa in the Ejaculate
J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 414 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
V.W. Aoki, L. Liu, and D.T. Carrell
A novel mechanism of protamine expression deregulation highlighted by abnormal protamine transcript retention in infertile human males with sperm protamine deficiency
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 12(1): 41 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Zini, J. Meriano, K. Kader, K. Jarvi, C. A. Laskin, and K. Cadesky
Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3476 - 3480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
V. W. Aoki, S. I. Moskovtsev, J. Willis, L. Liu, J. B. M. Mullen, and D. T. Carrell
DNA Integrity Is Compromised in Protamine-Deficient Human Sperm
J Androl, November 1, 2005; 26(6): 741 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
T. Yoshii, N. Kuji, S. Komatsu, K. Iwahashi, Y. Tanaka, H. Yoshida, A. Wada, and Y. Yoshimura
Fine resolution of human sperm nucleoproteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 11(9): 677 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
V. Mitchell, K. Steger, C. Marchetti, J.-C. Herbaut, P. Devos, and J.-M. Rigot
Cellular expression of protamine 1 and 2 transcripts in testicular spermatids from azoospermic men submitted to TESE-ICSI
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 11(5): 373 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. W. Aoki, L. Liu, and D. T. Carrell
Identification and evaluation of a novel sperm protamine abnormality in a population of infertile males
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1298 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Zini, A. Blumenfeld, J. Libman, and J. Willis
Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 1018 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, M. Spano, K. Jepson, L. Bungum, and A. Giwercman
The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
L. Mengual, J. L. Ballesca, C. Ascaso, and R. Oliva
Marked Differences in Protamine Content and P1/P2 Ratios in Sperm Cells From Percoll Fractions Between Patients and Controls
J Androl, May 1, 2003; 24(3): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society of Andrology.