Journal of Andrology Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hossain, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hossain, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, P. M.

Journal of Andrology, Vol 22, Issue 1 119-123, Copyright © 2001 by The American Society of Andrology

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Lack of significant morphological differences between human X and Y spermatozoa and their precursor cells (spermatids) exposed to different prehybridization treatments

A. M. Hossain, S. Barik and P. M. Kulkarni
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612, USA. amjad@uic.edu

Human X and Y spermatozoa were previously compared by several nonmolecular techniques. Recent studies show that in many of the previous investigations, the methods used to identify the spermatozoa were nonspecific and thus produced contradictory findings. In the present study, the comparison of the 2 germ cell types, X and Y, were performed following fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the most reliable genotyping technique currently available. The FISH technique was performed under 3 different treatments: permeabilization with liquid N2, fixation with Carnoy's, and chromatin decondensation with lithium di-iodosalicylate. Mature and immature germ cells (spermatozoa and spermatids) were compared. Lithium showed higher hybridization efficiency, while liquid N2 and Carnoy's fixative maintained better morphological integrity of cells with lower hybridization. The sperm exhibiting hybridization signals were not different in any of the morphometric or qualitative comparisons from those that did not exhibit signals. No significant deviation of the sex ratio from 1:1 was seen in either the mature or immature germ cell population. The spatial distribution of X and Y chromosome-specific signals in the sperm head were identical. The hybridization treatments did not have any preferential effect on the cells of specific genotype (X or Y). Neither head parameters (length, HL; width, HW; area, HA) nor tail length (TL) significantly differed between X and Y populations of spermatozoa under any of the treatments. Similarly, the haploid, X-specific round cells did not differ from Y-specific ones by their size (diameter) and shape. These results indicate that neither mature sperm nor their precursors possess significant morphological differences between X and Y genotypes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
V. J Grant
Entrenched misinformation about X and Y sperm.
BMJ, April 15, 2006; 332(7546): 916 - 916.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Celik-Ozenci, J. Catalanotti, A. Jakab, C. Aksu, D. Ward, P. Bray-Ward, R. Demir, and G. Huszar
Human Sperm Maintain Their Shape Following Decondensation and Denaturation for Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization: Shape Analysis and Objective Morphometry
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1347 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society of Andrology.