| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Reproductive
Medicine and Biology, The University of
Texas Medical School at Houston,
Houston, Texas
Diabetes mellitus in man is frequently associated with sexual dysfunction. It is now generally agreed that retrograde ejaculation and impotence in diabetic men are caused in the majority of
cases by diabetic neuropathy of the pelvic autonomic nervous system. Occasionally, impotence
may be related to diabetic vascular disease. Decreased androgen production is an extremely rare
cause of impotence in diabetic men. Thus, testosterone should not be used empirically in the
treatment of these patients. Reports on the effects of diabetes on androgen
and gonadotropin secretion, testicular histology,
semen quality, and fertility of men have often
been contradictory, with some authors suggesting
that diabetes results in severe disturbances and
others reporting no detrimental effects. This discrepancy appears to be related predominantly to
differences between study populations, particularly with regard to the degree of control of the
diabetes of each patient and the type of treatment
that the subjects received. Recent reports have
suggested that the function of the hypothalamic
pituitarytesticular axis remains normal or is
only very mildly affected in patients with well controlled diabetes, while suppression of gonadotropin and androgen secretion and testicular
lesions occur in patients with improperly controlled diabetes. This conclusion is supported
by studies in laboratory animals demonstrating
that disturbances of pituitary and testicular function in diabetic animals increase in severity with
the duration and degree of hyperglycemia. Thus,
the question of the possible effect of diabetes on
the hypothalamicpituitarytesticular axis in
man needs to be re-evaluated in properly designed and controlled studies. Although several reports have been published
suggesting the association of diabetes in man with
compromised spermatozoal motility, this is also
controversial; the mechanisms by which diabetes
could result in this disturbance remain to be
elucidated. Finally, it is important to emphasize that the
incidence of undiagnosed diabetes in patients
with compromised semen quality is very low.
Thus, this reviewer agrees with Spellacy et al
(1979) that routine evaluation of the carbohydrate
metabolic status of every patient with abnormal
semen analysis is probably not cost effective.
Accepted on February 18, 1980
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |